Search for: "Advertiser Co. v. Hobbie" Results 1 - 18 of 18
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2013, 8:15 am by Eugene Volokh
The one time it came before for the Court was in Gallagher v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 12:47 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
 Jonathan Markell’s 18 months behind bars is perhaps the most given in a transnational antiquities trafficking case since U.S. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:06 am by Marie Louise
Walthers, Inc (Docket Report) (Gray on Claims) District Court C D California:  Falsely advertising compliance with patented method constitutes false marking: King Tuna v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 10:14 am by Josh Blackman
This example also echoed another case pending before the Court this term: Andy Warhol Foundation v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 5:00 am by Steve McConnell
All kinds of products from everywhere were advertised and sold. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 11:55 am by admin
We applied a well-established method in social science, which is broadly accepted as being, you know, a reputable method of analyzing something, content analysis, in order to show that there was this fairly substantial disparity between what the company scientists were saying in their private reports and publishing in peer-reviewed scientific literature which was essentially consistent with what other scientists were saying versus what the company was saying in public in advertisements that… [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 12:48 am by INFORRM
For example in Lindqvist the court essentially decided that a pensioner could be criminally prosecuted for uploading information about her colleagues’ hobbies during an IT course, and in Digital Rights Ireland struck down an entire piece of legislation on the basis it was not compatible with Charter rights. [read post]
16 May 2007, 9:28 pm
  That was a little advertisement to retrigger your interest. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
But the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (also known as McCain-Feingold, after its two chief sponsors) forbids political advertisements paid for by corporations in the weeks before a primary. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am by Hilde
But the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (also known as McCain-Feingold, after its two chief sponsors) forbids political advertisements paid for by corporations in the weeks before a primary. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am by Editor
Had he lived, he might have co-authored the absurd NASCAR substance abuse policy. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am by Editor
Had he lived, he might have co-authored the absurd NASCAR substance abuse policy. [read post]