Search for: "American Airlines, Inc. v. Miller" Results 1 - 20 of 24
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2013, 6:56 am by Joy Waltemath
Moreover, unlike the lone First Circuit decision, DiFiore v American Airlines, Inc, which involved an effort to use an employee compensation statute to directly attack an airline’s prices and services, neither the deduction nor the reimbursement statute had a direct connection to FedEx’s prices, routes, or services. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 9:00 am by P. Andrew Torrez
 Not to toot our own horn, but the judge's rationale for throwing out the severance package -- that Horton's value added accrued to American Airlines and not to the new company, and therefore that the bankruptcy rules applied -- is pretty much what we said back in February. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 8:54 am by Moseley Collins
Black cites the following cases, all after judgment, verdict or nonsuit, which do not support granting her motion to strike since the cases do not concern the pleadings stage of litigation: American Airlines, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 11:51 am by admin
The paper sets out an argument that apportionment is a 20th century reform of American tort law, from the common law’s “all or nothing” approach.[1] I respectfully disagree with Professor Green’s assessment. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 8:32 am by John Elwood
Courts of Appeals for the 4th, 8th, 9th and 10th Circuits hold; and (3) whether the portion of Trans World Airlines Inc. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
– Facebook’s contractual rights to users’ photos problematic: (Spicy IP)PharmaEuropean Commission probes pharmaceutical sector: (Philip Brooks),WHO Board sets course on IP, avian flu, tighter publication policy: (Intellectual Property Watch),India: The Competition Act, patents and over hyped drugs: (Part I - Spicy IP), (Part II – Spicy IP), (Part III – Spicy IP),Ignoring not the solution –… [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Apr. 2, 2009)Affirming dismissal of fem's gender/discharge etc claim6th Circuit Miller v. [read post]