Search for: "Apodaca v. Does"
Results 21 - 40
of 65
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2020, 9:26 am
Appellate courts in Louisiana affirmed the conviction, relying on Apodaca v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 10:54 am
A state liberty interest does not a federal liberty interest make. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 1:34 pm
” In 1972, in Apodaca v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 11:53 pm
(Orin Kerr) I recently blogged about United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:14 pm
The case of Apodaca v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 1:51 pm
Here’s the basic issue: In Apodaca v. [read post]
31 May 2021, 9:01 pm
Justice Kagan dissented in Ramos, concluding the Court had misapplied principles of stare decisis in jettisoning the Court’s previous ruling in 1972 in Apodaca v. [read post]
17 May 2021, 11:01 am
The dispute over nonunanimous jury verdicts dates back almost 50 years, to the court’s 1972 ruling in Apodaca v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 7:38 am
The majority also addressed its decision in Apodaca v. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 11:00 am
Ramos y (2) someramente en un escrito que sometieron varios estados republicanos implorando que no se revocara a Apodaca v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:34 am
Florida, in which the Court held that the Sixth Amendment does not require juries to have twelve members, and Apodaca v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 11:28 am
” However, Gorsuch explained, it “turns out that the Sixth Amendment’s otherwise simple story took a strange turn” with the Supreme Court’s 1972 decision in Apodaca v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 7:26 am
They would have upheld nonunanimous verdicts because of the past precedent supporting them, the splintered decision in Apodaca v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 10:39 am
Nearly 50 years ago, in Apodaca v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 5:50 pm
In 1972, in Apodaca v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:01 pm
Nearly 50 years ago, in Apodaca v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 3:56 am
Only two states allow this, Louisiana and Oregon, and forty years ago, in Apodaca v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 11:51 am
As the Supreme Court stated in footnote 35 of Stone v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 3:29 pm
For this reason, I believe that the present Florida system does comply with Ring, given the holding of Apodaca v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 8:02 am
One issue dividing justices in Ramos is the treatment of precedent, as the decision overturned Apodaca v. [read post]
