Search for: "Arnold v. Pfizer, Inc."
Results 1 - 15
of 15
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2015, 5:47 pm
Flash forward one hundred or so years and look at the recent Pfizer case in England:From Bloomberg:Pfizer Inc. was accused by a U.K. judge of making “groundless threats” of legal action against British doctors and drugstores if they prescribed or sold a generic version of its best-selling Lyrica treatment.Judge Richard Arnold issued the rebuke as he ruled that Allergan Plc’s Actavis unit didn’t infringe Pfizer patents with its version of… [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 5:18 am
A similar situation arose a few years in Pfizer v Roche [2019] EWHC 1520 (Pat). [read post]
29 May 2014, 5:00 am
The new cases are Arnold v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
In the brand-new Court of Appeal decision just out - Actavis UK Ltd & Others v Eli Lilly & Company [2015] EWCA Civ 555 (25 June 2015), Lord Justice Floyd (Lords Justices Kitchin and Longmore concurring) disagreed with Arnold J on two main issues. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 6:03 am
Blame old geezers like me | Mr Justice Arnold to become Lord Justice Arnold: congratulations! [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., 819 F. [read post]
29 May 2014, 5:39 am
Levitt, an Associate General Counsel of Pfizer, Inc., and Janet Wittes, of the Statistics Collaborative, presented. [read post]
16 May 2012, 12:22 pm
Pfizer Inc., ___ F. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:34 am
, pens this post about the well-known and much-debated issue of the product plain packaging [on which see earlier Katposts here, here, here, and here].* Court of Appeal dismisses Rovi's claim construction attempt in battle with VirginA few days ago the Court of Appeal of England and Wales handed down its decision in Rovi Guides Inc v Virgin Media Ltd & Others [2015] EWCA Civ 1214. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 4:30 am
An AIPPI Rapid Response Event | UK UPC ratification still on track despite Article 50 trigger | Does Mr Justice Arnold's decision in Teva v MSD show just how large a role patent law has come to play in assessing SPC validity? [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Garman Co., 843 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Ark. 1992); Arnold v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 6:58 am
The patent belongs Warner-Lambert, a company that was acquired by Pfizer in 2000. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:17 am
The removal of the own name defence and fundamental rights – Sky v SkyKickSky v SkyKick [2017] EWHC 1769 (Ch) (July 2017)Most trade mark lawyers know Sky’s reputation for pursuing action against anyone using the word SKY in their name, even SKYPE. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 1:04 pm
Pfizer, Inc., No. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 7:08 pm
Cir. 2018), Arnold Partnership v. [read post]
