Search for: "Atis v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 70
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2014, 9:40 am by Jason Rantanen
ATI Technologies, Inc., 607 F.3d 784, 794 (Fed. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Proia, Freeing the Prop 8 Tape: Perry v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:34 pm by Schachtman
The authors stated that the experiment had the approval of the University of North Carolina School of Medicine Committee on the Protection of the Rights of Human Subjects. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 7:04 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
ATI Techs., Inc., 607 F.3d 784, 796 (Fed. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:30 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 3:18 am by Woodrow Pollack
Plaintiff responded with a covenant not to sue:neither ATI no any successor in interest to ATI will sue Velocity Micro, Inc. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 8:44 am by Eric Schweibenz
On December 21, 2010, the Federal Circuit issued its opinion in Spansion, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 11:36 pm
Spansion, Freescale Semiconductor, ATI Technologies, STMicroselectronics, and Qualcomm v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 6:05 am
(see Horsepower) Bridge Formula A bridge protection formula used by federal and state governments to regulate the amount of weight that can be put on each of a vehicle's axles, and how far apart the axles (or groups of axles) must be to legally carry a given weight [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 11:27 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
As a general matter, federal courts apply state law to 'substantive' questions when state law created the underlying cause of action. [read post]
28 May 2010, 12:08 pm by Tom Fisher
On June 9, 2010, the Federal Circuit is scheduled to hear oral argument in Spansion, Inc. v. [read post]