Search for: "Ayala v. United States" Results 61 - 78 of 78
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am by John Elwood
United States, 13-1487, voluntarily turned over to the FBI fifteen firearms while unrelated marijuana charges were pending against him. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:31 am by Amy Howe
United States and argues that “the lopsided win illustrates the need for a federal statute defining the default mens rea (guilty mind) to be proven in criminal cases. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 9:00 am by Maureen Johnston
United States 14-29Issue: (1) Whether, in a prosecution for insider trading under § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:10 am by Maureen Johnston
United States 14-29Issue: (1) Whether, in a prosecution for insider trading under § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:57 am by John Elwood
Ayala, 13-1428, a state-on-top two-time relist outta the Golden State, asks whether the conclusion a claim represents harmless error is an “adjudication on the merits” under the federal habeas statute, 28 U.S.C. [read post]
15 May 2010, 3:23 am by SHG
True, an objectively reasonable traffic stop is not invalidated because the primary motivation of the police was to investigate some other matter (see Whren v United States, 517 US 806 [1996]; People v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 4:51 pm by Adam Rosenthal and Robert Foster
  Much of the guidance issued by OSHA during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has originated from guidance from the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”). [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 12:45 pm by Mark Walsh
Ayala, the Court rules five to four to reverse the Ninth Circuit and hold that a trial judge’s decision to exclude a criminal defendant’s attorney from part of a Batson v. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 9:31 am by Elie Maalouf
United States, 9 The United States Supreme Court also recognized that the discovery of communications is distinct from the discovery of the underlying facts of those communications. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Bureau of Prisons, No. 06-9130 I"n a case involving the scope of 28 U.S.C. section 2680, which carves out certain exceptions to the United States' waiver of sovereign immunity for torts committed by federal employees, the Court rules that section 2680's broad phrase "any other law enforcement officer" covers all law enforcement officers, and not just law enforcement officers enforcing customs or excise laws. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, February 04, 2008 State of Wisconsin v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 1:09 pm
Ayala-Tapia, No. 06-2781 A conviction and sentence for importing and possessing with intent to distribute heroin are affirmed where: 1) the government presented sufficient evidence for a rational jury to conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant "knew" she was carrying drugs; and 2) defendant failed to meet the statutory requirements for the "safety valve" exception to apply to her case. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am by Schachtman
Over 20 years ago, in 1993, the United States Supreme Court handed down its Daubert decision. [read post]