Search for: "Barrett Co. v. United States"
Results 181 - 200
of 246
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2018, 4:14 pm
In Barrett v. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 11:05 am
I ultimately did not answer this question, but said the question was open under Walter Nixon v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:25 am
The case of Andrew Fitch-Holland, the co-accused in the trial, has been reduced to the status of a “sideshow”, according to his QC, Jonathan Laidlaw. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 11:32 am
Gordon College v. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 9:59 am
She wrote the Court’s majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 11:20 am
Tex. 2005) (Jack, J.)). [9] Mississippi Valley Silica Co. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 10:41 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 9:54 am
Co. v. [read post]
31 May 2022, 2:44 pm
United States (1945). [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm
The developer now urges the court to revisit its open-ended test for assessing regulatory takings under Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:01 am
United States, 320 U.S. 1, 60–61 (1943) (Frankfurter, J., dissenting in part) (‘‘it is an old observation that the training of Anglo–American judges ill fits them to discharge the duties cast upon them by patent legislation’’); Parke–Davis & Co. v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 3:19 pm
[Kelly v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:53 am
And even as a judge, he co-chaired the Commission on the Intelligence Capabilities of the United States Regarding Weapons of Mass Destruction. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 2:02 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 7:15 am
City of Oklahoma, 816 F.2d 539, 540-41 (10th Cir. 1987), alleging a right of privacy under the Florida state constitution and the United States Constitution; Brashear v. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 9:12 pm
The Court’s decision in FDA v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:57 am
When we asked it to name three noteworthy opinions of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg (Question #11), it started off strong: It identified (and correctly summarized) her majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm
Worley] [This post is co-authored with Seth Barrett Tillman] Recently, James Heilpern and Michael T. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
The event was co-sponsored by the Stanford Center for Racial Justice and the Stanford Constitutional Law Center. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 4:30 am
United States, the Court held that if a police officer has probable cause to make an arrest (or reasonable suspicion for a stop), then there is no Fourth Amendment violation, even if the officer's real reason for the arrest (or stop) would not satisfy the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
