Search for: "Baxter v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 206
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2008, 2:57 pm
The much-awaited New Hampshire Supreme Court decision in Baxter v. [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 5:48 am by Robert Kreisman
”  The United States district court granted the motion and this appeal to the court of appeals was taken. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 9:01 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Baxter While the litigation was pending on remand, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) completed a reexamination of the ’434 patent and determined that all asserted claims were invalid. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 8:17 am by Linda O'Brien (CCH)
Case date: 11 May 2021 Case number: No. 19-1077 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 5:04 am by INFORRM
United States Attorney General Merrick Garland has moved to represent Donald Trump in Jean E Carroll’s rape allegations against the former President. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 7:25 am
Baxter Recent court decisions show that patent infringement opinions are still important for any person or entity that becomes aware of a United States patent that is similar to their products, methods or processes. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 4:24 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Claim 16 states: “A centrifugal unit comprising a centrifugal component and a plurality of tubes . . . . [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 7:13 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit recently affirmed dismissal of a securities class action complaint based on the PSLRA pleadings standard clarified by the United States Supreme Court in Tellabs. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 2:15 am
The United States Supreme Court, in the little known 1975 case of US v. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 1:00 pm by The Public Employment Law Press
"In contrast, on October 26, 2017, a California appellate court handed down its decision in Baxter v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:05 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Jan. 2, 2019) (condition that respondent file a petition on behalf of petitioner for immigration to the United States after respondent’s move to the United States was not met); Chumachenko v. [read post]