Search for: "Bd. of Med. Examiners v. Court of Appeals" Results 1 - 20 of 21
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2016, 6:02 pm by stevemehta
  The Court of Appeal distinguished two of our opinions interpreting the Act — Delaney v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Kindermann In a lengthy and unanimous reversal of the trial court on ESA and CEQA issues in Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:01 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
A Florida appellate court found error in a judge of compensation court’s order requiring a claimant to pay one-half of the cancellation fee charged by the IME when the claimant appeared for the exam accompanied by a videographer and the physician refused to move forward with the examination [see Baptiste v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm by Schachtman
More Nonsense on Differential Diagnosis The Supreme Court recently addressed differential etiology in Matrixx Initiatives, in stunningly irrelevant and errant dicta: “We note that courts frequently permit expert testimony on causation based on evidence other than statistical significance. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am by Schachtman
Upon reviewing the factual record, however, the Court of Appeals held that the lower court’s finding was unsupported: “Dr. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 6:59 pm
See Franchise Tax Bd., 463 U.S. at 16, 19 (citing Skelly Oil Co. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm by admin
Supreme Court General Electric Co. v. [read post]