Search for: "Beecham v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 136
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2010, 10:27 am
Smithkline Beecham Corporation, No. 10-15257 On August 10, 2010, the United States Department of Labor filed an amicus curae brief in support of the Plaintiffs, current and former pharmaceutical representatives, in the matter of Christopher v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 1:56 pm
PRESS RELEASE: GlaxoSmithKline (NYSE: GSK) today announced that it has reached agreement with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to join the USPTO’s motion to dismiss its litigation over Final Regulations published in August 2007 (Triantafyllos Tafas and SmithKline Beecham Corporation, SmithKline Beecham PLC and Glaxo Group Limited vs. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 12:55 pm
Dudas and the United States Patent and Trademark Office are permanently enjoined from implementing the Final Claims and Continuations Rules. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 12:39 pm by Leigh Anne Benedic
In a highly anticipated decision under the Fair Labor Standards Act, the United States Supreme Court handed down a big win on Tuesday for the pharmaceutical industry when the Court found pharmaceutical sales representatives are covered by the outside sales exemption in Christopher v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 2:01 pm by Andrew
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States granted a writ of certiorari in Christopher v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 10:03 am by Lyle Denniston
United States (and 11-5721 – Hill v. [read post]