Search for: "Bounds v. Commissioner of Public Safety"
Results 1 - 20
of 56
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
"***That said, the court commented that because of the "competing policy ... favoring strong disciplinary authority for those in charge of police forces[, w]here legislation specifically commits police discipline to the discretion of local officials," the policy favoring collective bargaining will give way to the legislatively established disciplinary procedures, citing Police Benevolent Asso. of NY State Troopers, Inc., v Division of NY State Police, 11 NY3d 96.It was… [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 12:45 pm
Schenectady advised PBA that was replacing the contract disciplinary procedure, under which an employee upon whom disciplinary charges had been served had the right of appeal to an arbitrator, and, instead, unilaterally adopted disciplinary procedures that substituted the Public Safety Commissioner for the arbitrator as the ultimate administrative disciplinary decision maker. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 7:30 am
FRENCH: Cliquez ici pour le télécharger. .GRAND CHAMBERCASE OF S.A.S. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 6:43 am
The case is Demetriou v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 11:17 pm
The abstract gives a brief flavor of their tendentious narrative: “The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 and the Workers Right to Know laws later in that decade were signature moments in the history of occupational safety and health. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
Four years later, in November 2017, the case was finally heard by a chamber of the ECHR alongside two related cases that also brought allegations under Article 8: the Bureau of Investigative Journalism and Alice Ross v. the United Kingdom (2014) and 10 Human Rights Organisations and Others v. the United Kingdom (2015). [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 11:07 am
See, e.g., Ruth v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm
§ 4102.051(a) (providing that "[a] person may not act as a public insurance adjuster in this state or hold himself or herself out to be a public insurance adjuster in this state unless the person holds a license issued by the commissioner"). [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm
§ 4102.051(a) (providing that "[a] person may not act as a public insurance adjuster in this state or hold himself or herself out to be a public insurance adjuster in this state unless the person holds a license issued by the commissioner"). [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
[Ross v Oxford Academy & CSD, 187 AD2d 898, leave to appeal denied, 81 NY2d 705]Suspending an employee for 30 days without pay for engaging in conduct that may result in a safety hazard. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:29 pm
"Findlaw summaries [may] include opoinions that have not yet been released for publication and may be subject to modification, correction or withdrawl U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, August 22, 2008 Price v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 5:12 am
However, the court felt bound by the Supreme Court of Ohio’s 1986 decision in Kocisko v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 8:25 pm
Title: Siefert v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 5:15 pm
In Ontario (Public Safety and Security) v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 10:53 am
I give the highlights of two new and eminently contestable cyberlaw rulings: In U.S. v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 5:17 pm
The exemption claims were upheld, but the Information Commissioner applied the public interest override to order release of the documents to which it applied. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 3:58 pm
Wood v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis (2009) - Judgment Andrew Wood was an activist involved in the Campaign Against the Arms Trade (CAAT). [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 3:58 pm
Wood v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis (2009) - Judgment Andrew Wood was an activist involved in the Campaign Against the Arms Trade (CAAT). [read post]
3 May 2014, 1:06 pm
Thus, while the safety of the public is a permissible factor to consider, it doesn’t “include second-guessing how the commissioner administers the home detention program. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm
Dingemans LJ and Garnham J held that requests for documents by public inquiries were “bound to lead to the inclusion of some irrelevant material”, but that did not make the request unlawful. [read post]
