Search for: "Bowman v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 413
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
He also nominated Michelle Bowman, Commissioner of the State Bank of Kansas, for a seat on the board reserved for someone with community banking experience. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 8:09 am by Phil Dixon
North Carolina adopted Whren under the state constitution in State v. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 10:27 am by Howard Friedman
Rickless, Maimon Schwarzschild, William Voegeli, Larry Alexander, 54 San Diego Law Review 197-341 (2017).Gerard V. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
West Virginia State Board of Education: The Flag Salute Cases, by by Winston Bowman, Associate Historian, Federal Judicial History Office, Federal Judicial Center. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 6:59 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Driving with a suspended license Appellant, Shuran Latay Douglas, was tried and convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court for Kent County (Bowman, J.) of driving while his license was suspended, possessing a suspended license, failing to surrender a suspended license and displaying registration plates issued ... [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 5:38 am by Mitra Sharafi
I sometimes show short movie clips at the start of lecture classes too- I have shown short clips of relevant sections of "Eyes on the Prize" in my Con Law class on Brown v Board and affirmative action/Bakke- not sure it can be streamed but usually your law library will have or can ILL the DVDs- and some "Firing Line" clips of William F Buckley debating the ERA (these are on YouTube), etc.Elizabeth Pleck: Loving v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 6:52 am by Eric Goldman
State Farm Mutual * Court Orders Plaintiff to Turn Over Facebook and MySpace Passwords in Discovery Dispute — Zimmerman v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
But, by the end of the 1800s, this rationale lost currency, and by 1917 (in Bowman v Secular Society [1917] AC 406), the House of Lords held that blasphemy protected the religious sensitivities of the individual; but the courts still confined the scope of the offence to the established Church (this was confirmed as recently as 1991 in R v Chief Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Choudhury [1991] 1 QB 429). [read post]