Search for: "Burden v. North Dakota" Results 161 - 180 of 243
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2014, 8:25 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Furthermore, the Court found the circuit court erred in issuing the injunction as plaintiffs did not meet their burden for injunctive relief. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 8:40 am
The states that have such laws (or other laws that have this effect), as best I can tell, are California, Colorado, Connecticut, Hawaii, Indiana, Louisiana, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New York, North Dakota, Oregon, South Carolina, West Virginia, and Wyoming. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 10:12 am
North Dakota, 504 U.S. 298 (1992), in order for a state to collect sales and use taxes from a retailer for a given transaction, that retailer must maintain a “physical presence” in its customer’s state. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 7:00 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 38859 (D SD, March 25, 2014), a South Dakota federal district court dismissed an inmate's complaint that he was denied access to certain religious items, hardcover religious books and religious study classes.In Van Buren v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 9:54 pm by Luke Rioux
The court notes that, though a few other states have adopted concurrent causation via case law, Maine joins with only Alabama, North Dakota, Arkansas and Texas by incorporating the rule into our criminal statutes. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 11:09 am by Dorsey
  The non-compete laws of Montana are strikingly similar to those of California and North Dakota and originated with the Field Code which California adopted in 1872 and Montana adopted in 1875. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 9:46 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
Those states are Arkansas, Georgia, Idaho, Iowa, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mississippi, New Mexico, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Utah, Virginia and Wisconsin. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  We found a lot of cases – at least something useful from 42 jurisdictions:  all except Delaware, Hawaii, Maine, Nebraska, New Mexico, Oregon, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, South Dakota, and Wisconsin.As alluded to earlier, plaintiffs sometimes try to overcome inconvenient facts about a failure to read warnings with quirky arguments that the defendant should have communicated in a different fashion. [read post]
10 May 2013, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
North Dakota, and the inability of legislators, state employees, and citizens to understand the limitations of the Due Process Clause. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 6:51 am by Bill Marler
The number of infected persons identified in each state was as follows: Alabama (1), Arkansas (1), California (4), Colorado (40), Idaho (2), Illinois (4), Indiana (3), Iowa (1), Kansas (11), Louisiana (2), Maryland (1), Missouri (7), Montana (2), Nebraska (6), Nevada (1), New Mexico (15), New York (2), North Dakota (2), Oklahoma (12), Oregon (1), Pennsylvania (1), South Dakota (1), Texas (18), Utah (1), Virginia (1), West Virginia (1), Wisconsin (2), and Wyoming (4). [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
North Dakota Ups the Ante with Even More Restrictive Abortion Bills On March 19, North Dakota passed a new abortion law designed to ban most, if not all, abortions. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Robin E. Shea
*The Eighth Circuit hears appeals from federal district courts in Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota. [read post]