Search for: "C. G., Matter of"
Results 141 - 160
of 3,954
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
As a matter of fact, this particular approach to novelty only applies to claims directed at the use of a substance or composition for a method within the meaning of A 52(4) EPC 1973 (now A 53(c)).Claim 1 of the main request is drafted according to the model proposed by decision G 6/83, i.e. the use of a substance for the manufacture of a composition intended for a specific use. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 1:30 am
Palmor, Christine Vogeli, Timothy G. [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 11:18 am
G. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 4:03 pm
This has the result that the invention of claims 1 and 25 as granted falls under the prohibition of A 53(a) EPC taken in combination with R 28(c) EPC (cf. also G 2/06 [29]). [4] In agreement with decision G 1/03 the amended claims 1 and 25, both containing a disclaimer not removing more than what is necessary to disclaim subject-matter falling under the prohibition of A 53(a) EPC in combination with R 28(c) EPC, meet the requirements of A 123(2) EPC.… [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 11:19 am
See 9 FAM 601.7-3(c)(2)(a)(“Correspondence with Representatives of Record, Attorneys”). [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 7:23 pm
Peter G. [read post]
29 May 2012, 8:23 pm
Howard G. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:52 am
The post In the Supreme Court w/c 16 December 2013 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 9:00 pm
Amendments (Articles 100(c) and 123(2) EPC)(...)2.5 For these reasons the amendments made to claim 1 are based on the application as filed.3. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
The composition of the Enlarged Board was subsequently changed by an order dated 20 May 2021 of the Chairman of the Enlarged Board in case G 1/21.XIII. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 3:25 pm
McCarthy, Secretary of the Army Gen James C. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 5:01 pm
In substance, D2 discloses the examples A, B and C. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 8:11 am
” “It said Dalin was retained by Curtiss-Wright in October 2013, when he was at Swedish law firm G. [read post]
12 Sep 2006, 6:01 am
by Linda G. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 8:48 am
Moyer, Esq., Jackson, Wyoming.Representing Appellee Board of County Commissioners, Teton County, Wyoming: Nicole G. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:36 pm
There are two appeals being heard in the Supreme Court this week, commencing on Monday 11 April 2011 with R (on the application of G) v The Governors of X School, to be heard over two days by Lords Hope, Walker, Brown, Kerr and Dyson. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
Reference is made in particular to the statement in G 5/83 [ [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:28 am
NOTE: This Blog/Blawg, NJ Family Issues, is managed by Paul G. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 4:00 am
It unanimously reversed, on the law, Supreme Court’s ruling and granted WCSD’s petition to quash.the subpoena duces tecum issued by the Hearing Officer.* See Education Law §3020-a [3] [c] [iii] [A], [C].The decision is posted on the Internet http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2014/2014_06444.htm [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 4:03 pm
L. c. 208, § 34, as amended, in the event of a divorce. [read post]
