Search for: "COUNTS v. WYETH"
Results 1 - 20
of 113
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2022, 2:37 pm
See Cruz v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am
Of course, a challenge may be solely focused upon the expert witness’s credibility, such as when an expert witness testifies on many occasions only for one side in similar disputes, or for one whose political commitments render him unable to acknowledge the bona fides of any studies conducted by the adversarial parties.[1] If, however, the Rule 702 challenge stated an objection to the witness’s methodology, then the objection would count against both the opinion’s weight… [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 8:00 am
Supreme Court in Wyeth v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 2:17 pm
Rigsby and Universal Health Services v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 3:20 am
G7/832) What was unusual about the composition of the English Patents Court in the John Wyeth case in 1985? [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 7:48 am
Under the standard announced in Wyeth v. [read post]
19 Mar 2016, 10:13 am
--Wyeth v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:02 am
By Dennis Crouch Pfizer v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 5:00 am
” Id. at *10.Down for the count. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:12 am
Yates v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 1:01 pm
Wyeth Inc., 488 F. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 1:48 pm
See e.g, Wyeth v. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
Wyeth, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 11:16 am
” Plaintiffs will have to abide by that FDA judgment to avoid preemption.So while Reglan and other similar cases count as “wins” for the other side of the “v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 1:37 pm
Wyeth LLC, MDL No. 1203, Civ. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and if so how it is applied, careful… [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
Perhaps no case in the 8+ year history of the blog (well, maybe Wyeth v. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 1:41 pm
Wyeth-Ayerst Labs., 385 F.3d 961, 965-966 (6th Cir. 2004); Bouchard v. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 9:22 am
A short history of recent implied preemption “impossibility” decisions: (1) In Wyeth v. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 12:54 pm
Thus, the same opinion that starts out (p.18) quoting Wyeth v. [read post]
