Search for: "CROSS v. CALIFORNIA" Results 41 - 60 of 3,159
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2023, 8:09 am by Eric Goldman
Grindr Online Dating Services Must Give California Users a “Cooling Off” Period–Howell v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 4:43 pm
California, but so far as I am concerned that would be a very good thing. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
Barajas, University of California, Davis Regulators must redress transportation inequities in rural and disadvantaged communities. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 2:48 pm by CFM Admin
December 18, 2023 Clients, Friends, and Associates: As we near the end of 2023, we have highlighted some recent industry developments that will likely impact many of our clients. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:19 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The centrality of standing to this litigation is particularly interesting because (as happened in the California v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 5:00 am by Barbara Pfeffer Billauer
Because the condition involved two competing fields of science, medicine and biomechanics, the court ruled the proponent must establish cross-disciplinary validation to establish reliability. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 6:44 am by Daniel J. Gilman
Testimony for the government by Antonio Rangel, Bing [yep] Professor of Neuroscience, Behavioral Biology, and Economics at the California Institute of Technology, was widely reported (see, e.g., The New York Times here and Bloomberg here). [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm by Elizabeth Martinez
During debates, state Democrats argued that the bill is intended to challenge Arizona v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 6:51 am by John Coyle
[This post is cross posted at Transnational Litigation Blog.] [read post]