Search for: "California v. Wright"
Results 61 - 80
of 492
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2020, 8:01 am
Starting with: “Looking at Your Firm’s Balance Sheet: Law Firm Clients, and Lawyers, are Not Property” — “It has been almost two years since the California Supreme Court issued its decision in Heller Ehrman v. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 8:25 pm
Target (Docket Report) (EDTexweblog.com) Claim amendments in reexamination eliminate patentee’s right to past damages: District Court C D California – Antonious v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
No one knows for sure what the Supreme Court is going to do with Hollingsworth v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 10:43 am
(See Wright, Right to Credit on Child Support Arrearages for Time Parties Resided Together After Separation or Divorce (2002) 104 A.L.R.5th 605, 610-612 [absence of California cases] (hereinafter “ALR Annot., Credit for Time Resided”.) [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
Davis v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 1:50 pm
Consulting, LLC v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
Why would the California Supreme Court be inclined to stay out of this matter? [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 11:10 am
Judge Wright in the Central District of California awarded defendants collectively more than $700,000 in fees and costs, including fees incurred in preparing their fee applications. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 9:15 am
In Rowell v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court’s announcement in New York Times v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
SB 1272 submits the following question (designated by the California Secretary of State as Proposition 49) to the California electorate for its input: Shall the Congress of the United States propose, and the California Legislature ratify, an amendment or amendments to the United States Constitution to overturn Citizens United v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 4:23 am
Supreme Court's precedent ruling in U.S. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Courts can revisit their prior rulings, higher courts can change the legal landscape against which lower courts make decisions (as the Supreme Court in fact did in the immigration regulation setting in 2012 in Arizona v. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 4:53 pm
Wright, 2016 U.S. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 1:34 pm
Wright’s decision [PDF] is one of many new cases that have implemented the Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Alice v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 9:00 am
Rojas v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm
Indeed, in Gratz v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
California law, as reflected in the 1978 California Supreme Court ruling in Schmitz v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 2:04 pm
The government distinguishes a Ninth Circuit decision, Wright v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 12:15 am
Duong v. [read post]
