Search for: "Case v. Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks"
Results 1 - 20
of 224
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2024, 2:56 pm
Proc. 97-35, and cases like RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 4:56 pm
As non-exclusive examples, trademark cases vary from copyright cases and the inclusion of unfair competition claims with patent infringement claims may result in different tax treatment [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 2:22 am
On 20 December 2023, the UK Supreme Court handed down its highly anticipated judgment in the case of Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trademarks [2023] UKSC 49, unanimously ruling that only a natural person can be named as an inventor on a patent application. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 12:37 pm
Patent and Trademark Office] and the governing constitutional principles chart a clear course: Decisions by APJs must be subject to review by the Director. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 4:21 pm
In 2018, The Patent and Trademark Office rejected a lawyer’s application to register a trademark “Trump Too Small” for t-shirt printing. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:44 am
From Monday 26th – Tuesday 27th June the Court will hear the case of Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Professional Game Match Officials Ltd, on appeal from [2021] EWCA Civ 1370. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 1:28 am
Daimler and Nokia v. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 8:03 am
Smith & Nephew, Inc. 22-639Issue: Whether the Commissioner for Patents’ exercise of the Patent and Trademark Office Director’s authority pursuant to an internal agency delegation violated the Federal Vacancies Reform Act. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 1:22 pm
FTC (2021)and now again in the pending case, Axon Enterprise Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 1:46 pm
Commissioner Phillips’ Dissent Phillips meticulously made the case that 1-800 Contacts’ behavior raised no antitrust concerns. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
In Myland, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 8:55 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 9:04 am
The remedy was to sever the limits on the Senate-confirmed Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) Director’s authority to review PTAB decisions. [read post]
27 May 2022, 1:10 pm
It also challenges a decision by the Commissioner for Patents denying Arthrex’s request for the Director of the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) to review the Board’s decision and grant rehearing. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 1:01 am
The Supreme Court case, Diamond v. [read post]
Arthrex on Remand: Commissioner of Patents Drew Hirshfeld and the Problem of Shadow Acting Officials
24 Mar 2022, 4:39 pm
The Court figured this ruling would leave the Presidentially-appointed, Senate-confirmed US Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) Director with full review authority in those cases. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
Supreme Court’s statement in Reiter v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 7:36 am
His main contingent was in Boston, so his basic influence was in Boston, he controlled the Boston Patent Law Association. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 5:38 pm
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 7:00 am
The Commissioner of Patents, dismissed the appellants’ action and upheld the respondents’ counterclaim, finding that each of the claims of the patent were obvious to the person skilled in the art of the patent at the priority date. [read post]
