Search for: "Cassidy v Cassidy"
Results 81 - 100
of 264
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2010, 6:01 am
” Nine years later, the Supreme Court decided Cassidy v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 3:48 pm
Supreme Court decision, Abood v. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 7:50 am
That is the big news about Gonzales v. [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 9:00 pm
Cassidy, _ F.Supp.2d _ (D.Md. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 4:58 pm
The first day of March brings a whole group of authors discussing the implications of today's Stab v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 5:00 pm
Supreme Court In CompuCredit Corp. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 5:39 am
In this regard, said the court, “An individual does not have a "legally protectable interest" in an appointment to the position of police officer merely because he or she achieved a sufficient score on the examination to be placed on an eligibility list,” citing Andriola v Ortiz, 82 NY2d 320 and Cassidy v Municipal Civil Service Commission of City of New Rochelle, 37 NY2d 526. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 12:06 pm
Cassidy (a stalking case involving a federal statute).) [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 4:29 pm
A federal district court has ruled in Genzyme Corp. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 12:26 pm
Those interested in this issue should also read, or perhaps re-read, Joni Cassidy's posting on this blog: Skyriver: Could It be a Contender? [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
If it is found that the third parties in this case were negligent then the respondent will be liable under its non-delegable duty of care to the appellant. [1] Brown v Nelson & Ors [1971] LGR 20 [2] Gold v Essex County Council [1942] 2 KB 293, 301 [3] Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343 [4] A (Child) v Ministry of Defence [2005] QB 183, 47 per Lord Phillips of Worth [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
If it is found that the third parties in this case were negligent then the respondent will be liable under its non-delegable duty of care to the appellant. [1] Brown v Nelson & Ors [1971] LGR 20 [2] Gold v Essex County Council [1942] 2 KB 293, 301 [3] Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343 [4] A (Child) v Ministry of Defence [2005] QB 183, 47 per Lord Phillips of Worth [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 9:43 am
Lynch v. [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 6:01 am
Peter Margulies explained the Supreme Court’s decision in Biden v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
As the Court of Appeals held in Cassidy v Municipal Civil Service Commission of City of New Rochelle, 37 N.Y.2d 526, Civil Service Law §61(1) grants the appointing authority broad discretion in the selection of candidates, including that of appointing a lower-scoring candidate over a higher-scoring one. [read post]
30 Sep 2017, 11:13 am
NFIB v. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 2:33 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Here’s one thing that puzzles me about United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 12:15 pm
In this regard, said the court, "An individual does not have a "legally protectable interest" in an appointment to the position of police officer merely because he or she achieved a sufficient score on the examination to be placed on an eligibility list," citing Andriola v Ortiz, 82 NY2d 320 and Cassidy v Municipal Civil Service Commission of City of New Rochelle, 37 NY2d 526.Specifically, the Appellate Division commented that "'An appointing… [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 2:03 pm
On July 17, the Patels (via Davis) sent a proposed but unexecuted triple net lease to Cassidy. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 12:42 pm
Las víctimas de accidentes de bicicletas deben conocer sus derechos. [read post]
