Search for: "Cause of Action v. FTC"
Results 1 - 20
of 618
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2024, 7:38 am
Basbanes v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 10:25 pm
” United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 12:18 pm
Breaching this covenant can create an independent cause of action. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 2:33 pm
Something like this is what happened in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 7:04 am
For instance, the case Rosalba Alassini v Telecom Italia SpA concerns an Italian regulation mandating non-binding dispute resolution before court action in consumer-telecommunications provider disputes. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
In that case we have a zone of interests test and a proximate cause test—adding in a harm requirement at least for claims that sound in 43(a). [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
Have you had a reckless or knowing disregard of the foreseeable risks of your actions, in this case, deploying a particular AI model? [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 7:35 pm
Those alleged “unconscionable” price increases caused substantial injury to consumers. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 1:37 pm
Is there anything but Sullivan that makes private causes of action into state action? [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 10:36 am
The court says the FTC endorsement guidelines can’t form the basis of a Florida consumer protection claim. * Martin v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 10:33 am
[cause harm] comparable to or the same as a violation of the law. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Morrison, George Washington University Law School An upcoming Supreme Court case highlights why businesses and individuals favor for-cause protection for administrative law judges. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 11:44 am
The copyright law implications of AI training are currently being litigated in several different federal copyright infringement actions. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
As the Supreme Court explained in Mistretta v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 12:01 pm
If the accused can provide evidence or arguments showing that their actions were not intended to hijack and control an aircraft but rather were part of an emergency situation or they were forced to commit the actions under duress, it can serve as a strong defence. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 6:44 am
Way back in May, I cracked wise about the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) fictional “Bureau of Let’s Sue Meta,” noting that the commission’s proposal (really, an “order to show cause”) to modify its 2020 settlement of a consumer-protection matter with what had then been Facebook—in other words, a settlement modifying a 2012 settlement—was the FTC’s third enforcement action with Meta in the first half of… [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 1:26 pm
Although the Court long ago recognized that defamation claims need First Amendment safeguards because the state, through the judiciary, is making rules for speech, it is now unwilling to recognize the need for similar limits on other causes of action. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 3:01 pm
I’ve been writing a fair bit about Federal Trade Commission (FTC) rulemaking initiatives. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 10:54 am
Circuit made this point clear in its 2001 FTC v. [read post]
