Search for: "Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 294
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2010, 1:52 pm by WIMS
"       Access the complete opinion (click here).Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 12:07 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
See Chevron U.S.A., Inc., v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 4:20 am by Michael C. Dorf
"For those of my readers who did not attend law school in the last 40 years, didn't take administrative law when they did, or took administrative law but forgot the one thing that everyone else remembers from that class, Chevron refers to the 1984 case of Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:07 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Raimondo – that may determine whether courts will continue to give deference to a federal agency’s interpretation of an ambiguous federal statute as held in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2017, 5:27 am by Jonathan H. Adler
While I concur in the judgment, I write separately to note my discomfort with our reasoning, which is dictated by the regimes of deference adopted by the Supreme Court in Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
In this case, Lexington Land sued Chevron U.S.A., Inc. for alleged damage to its property arising out of Chevron’s and its predecessor’s oil and gas operations in the Sardine Point Field from 1959 through 1991. [read post]
In this case, Lexington Land sued Chevron U.S.A., Inc. for alleged damage to its property arising out of Chevron’s and its predecessor’s oil and gas operations in the Sardine Point Field from 1959 through 1991. [read post]
In this case, Lexington Land sued Chevron U.S.A., Inc. for alleged damage to its property arising out of Chevron’s and its predecessor’s oil and gas operations in the Sardine Point Field from 1959 through 1991. [read post]
In this case, Lexington Land sued Chevron U.S.A., Inc. for alleged damage to its property arising out of Chevron’s and its predecessor’s oil and gas operations in the Sardine Point Field from 1959 through 1991. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 9:31 am
" Id. at 46719.Chevron does appear [a lot]:In holding that the Final Rules are ultra vires, the court made no effort to measure the Final Rules against the actual terms of Section 2(b)(2), nor did the court give the USPTO's interpretation of that provision the deference required by Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]