Search for: "Coats v. General Motors Corp."
Results 1 - 20
of 23
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2020, 10:43 am
Reactive Surfaces Ltd., LLP v.Toyota Motor Corp., No. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 6:28 am
Of course, the globeandmail treated a different licensor, NTP, quite differently in reporting the NTP v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
General Motors Corp. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 3:12 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 11:26 am
Corp., 394 F.3d 320, 325 (5th Cir. 2004); see Runnels v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 1:28 am
General Motors Corp., 542 F.2d 445, 452-53 (7th Cir. 1976); United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 2:30 am
Coatings v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 10:00 pm
Life Technologies Corp. et al. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
As to them, however, we adhere to our general rule that we don’t do the other side’s research for them.AlabamaThe Alabama Supreme Court held, in E.R. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 12:00 am
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.June 3, 2009 - 11 AM: In re Hyundai Motor America, Serial No. 78889340 [Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark ECHELON for "automobiles" in view of the identical mark registered for "automotive tires"].June 11, 2009 - 2 PM: General Cable Technologies Corporation v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 10:00 pm
Life Technologies Corp. et al. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 5:55 am
The relevant case for that analysis is Marubeni America Corp. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm
General Motors Corp., 141 F.3d 714, 720 (7th Cir. 1998) (disallowing opinion of expert witness, who “lacked any scientific basis for an opinion about … motives,” about defendant’s failure to add safety measure in order to “save money”); In re Diet Drugs Prods. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 2:26 pm
Noerr Motor Freight, 365 U.S. 127 (1961) ("Noerr") and Professional Real Estate Investors v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am
The underpinning of Daubert is that an expert’s opinion could be unreliable and the jury could not figure that out, even given cross-examination and argument, because the jurors are deferent to a qualified expert (i.e., the white lab coat effect). [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 1:43 pm
Toyota Motor Corp. et al., case number 1:18-cv-22798, in the U.S. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 6:04 am
Mobil Oil Corp., 301 Ill. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am
The same ‘white lab coat’ problem − that the jury will not be able to figure out the expert’s missteps − would seem to apply equally to basis, methodology and application. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 2:00 pm
In today’s case (Coates v. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
India: Gene silencing: (Spicy IP), India: US Patent reform implications for Indian Pharma: (Spicy IP), India: Generic pharmaceutical industry in the spotlight: (International Law Office), India: Supreme Court refuses to stay a Gujarat High Court decision restraining Ranbaxy from airing its controversial ads directed against Paras Pharma's 'Moov' brand: (Spicy IP),India: Patents on ARV drugs could increase costs: (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP),US: Survey… [read post]
