Search for: "Cochran v. Respondent"
Results 1 - 20
of 90
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2009, 6:55 am
We noted Krugman's attack (which didn't go far enough) on the "pseudo-science" (with apologies to Larry Laudan) of macroeconomics, but now one of his targets, John Cochrane, an economist in the Finance Department at the Business School here has responded,... [read post]
16 May 2022, 10:41 am
Cochran. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 12:18 am
Ryan Tucker, and advocate Lisa Oken set out the ASA development in their summary as follows:"THE NEXT STAGE – TAKING IT TO THE ADVERTISING STANDARDS AUTHORITY (“ASA”)In a ruling handed down by the ASA Directorate on 3 February 2015 (M-Systems Group v Cochrane Steel Products; Case number 2014-1859F), the next stage of the saga between the parties was decided. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 6:14 am
The petition there argues that the Fifth Circuit decision in Cochran v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 9:11 am
Axon Enterprise, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 2:30 am
V. [read post]
17 May 2022, 4:10 am
Michelle Cochran. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 4:01 am
Audry Linton v. [read post]
16 May 2022, 11:14 pm
Jones v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 7:35 pm
In Cochran v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 9:33 am
Cochran and Jarkesy v. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 7:21 am
In Jarkesy v. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 7:53 pm
The law is clear that scientific certainty is not required to prove causation to the legal standard of proof on a balance of probabilities (See: Snell v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 10:08 am
Well, um, in Miles v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 6:06 pm
Goodman v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 3:19 am
Read on for a recap of the TPIR lawsuit . . .Brandi Cochran v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 3:17 pm
Cochran. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 5:35 am
In a 1992 case, State v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 9:02 am
Cochran. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 10:00 pm
Cochrane Steel owns various trade marks including CLEAR VU.November: It was a cut-and-dried case of trade infringement and passing-off in Hendler & Hart (Pty) Ltd v BV Cookware (Pty) Ltd where the defendant was found to be selling kitchenware products in packaging bearing a mark closely resembling the applicant’s HART trade marks.In December, the Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa directed the respondent in Dart Industries Incorporated and another v… [read post]
