Search for: "Colle v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 296
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
In New York v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 8:56 pm
Kern v. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 3:40 pm
Online Surveys & Market Research Judge angered by special treatment for Andrew Sullivan [The Docket / MLW] United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 3:57 am
State Univ. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 6:54 pm
Salerno v. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 3:46 am
State, supra. [read post]
2 May 2017, 1:00 am
R (Coll) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 21 Feb 2017. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 4:04 pm
From Honeyfund.com inc v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 3:32 am
Co. v Batista, 165 AD3d 997, 998; Doviak v Finkelstein & Partners, LLP, 90 AD3d 696, 699; Quinn v Walsh, 18 AD3d 638; Brill v Friends World Coll., 133 AD2d 729). [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 6:52 am
Coll. of the Albemarle, No. 2:15-CV-00039-D, 2016 U.S. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 2:00 pm
Ct. at 676 (coll. cases). [read post]
3 May 2018, 3:00 am
At the outset we emphasize that "[t]he Legislature enacted FOIL to provide the public with a means of access to governmental records in order to encourage public awareness and understanding of and participation in government and to discourage official secrecy" (Matter of Alderson v New York State Coll. of Agric. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 1:00 am
R (Coll) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 21 Feb 2017. [read post]
15 May 2017, 1:00 am
R (Coll) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 21 Feb 2017. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 2:37 pm
In City of Duluth v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 7:51 am
Co. v Batista, 165 AD3d 997, 998; Doviak v Finkelstein &Partners, LLP, 90 AD3d 696, 699; Quinn v Walsh, 18 AD3d 638; Brill v Friends World Coll., 133 AD2d 729). [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 8:36 am
Collings, 256 F.3d 843, 847 (8th Cir. 2001)). [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 6:02 am
Trenton State Coll., 162 N.J. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
Brown, 2022 SCC 18 [2] At common law, automatism is “a state of impaired consciousness, rather than unconsciousness, in which an individual, though capable of action, has no voluntary control over that action” (R. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 4:35 am
U.S. v. [read post]
