Search for: "Colleen V. Chien"
Results 101 - 120
of 126
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2011, 9:00 pm
Interestingly, the ITC order follows a recentNYTimes editorial, by Professors Mark Lemley and Colleen Chien who argued for delay in exclusion orders in order to serve the public interest. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 9:00 pm
Interestingly, the ITC order follows a recentNYTimes editorial, by Professors Mark Lemley and Colleen Chien who argued for delay in exclusion orders in order to serve the public interest. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 9:11 pm
Interestingly, the ITC order follows a recent NYTimes editorial, by Professors Mark Lemley and Colleen Chien who argued for delay in exclusion orders in order to serve the public interest. [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 9:55 am
Second, the ITC has been gamed in the patent world (see, e.g., my colleague Colleen Chien's research on the ITC explaining how the ITC hears many US company vs. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 10:23 am
Sport of Kings suits (28%) (big co v. big co) [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:34 am
Here are five stellar comments from yesterday’s discussions—four regarding patents, and one about Maples: Colleen Chien – The Supreme Court is like an absentee parent who doesn’t know what the kids are up to, but issues directions nonetheless. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:17 am
For those interested in studying USITC litigation, some excellent recent analysis of the judicial body has been done by Colleen Chien and Sapna Kumar. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 6:57 pm
Unsurprisingly, articles related to the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act signed into law on Sept. 16 are starting to show up:[2036 downloads] Predicting Patent Litigation, by Colleen V. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 10:14 pm
The concluding paragraph from a piece on blogs.forbes: Until then, it’s not just patent trolling that is impacted by the potentially disproportionate power of high-tech patents – as the continuing onslaught of competitor smartphone suits shows. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 12:56 pm
Chien supports her arguments with a number of specific examples where she has carefully traced the patent assignment and litigation history.Finally, Part V proposes that "patentees themselves" could be an "overlooked lever of change within the patent system. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 11:09 am
Finally, Dmitry Karshtedt, a 3L at Stanford, highlighted a panel split in the Federal Circuit involving differing treatment of proven acts of direct infringement in figuring indirect infringement damages.The third panel, moderated by Professor Colleen Chien of Santa Clara, showcased empirical papers on patent damages. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 10:08 am
Krishnakumar From Arms Race to Marketplace: The Complex Patent Ecosystem and Its Implications for the Patent System Colleen V. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 10:15 am
Lemley, Stanford Law School 1:20 – 2:40 Transborder and Comparative Issues Moderator: Colleen Chien, Santa Clara University School of Law Frederick M. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 4:43 am
See Colleen Chien, Patent Amicus Briefs: What the Courts’ Friends Can Teach Us About the Patent System (2010); John F. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:03 pm
Colleen Chien: Government's brief will dictate Bilski result (PatLit) Terminal disclaimers and PTO: Proposal for a test case (Patently-O) Submitting positive decisions to the world patent offices (Patently-O) Chicago-centric team USA wins 2010 patent cup regatta (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) Patent marking trolls knocked down but not out: Pequignot v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 5:14 pm
Bilski v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 5:39 pm
Colleen Chien, Assistant Professor of Law, Santa Clara Law Alice A. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 11:35 am
Miscellaneous * Colleen Chien, Of Trolls, Davids, Goliaths, and Kings: Narratives and Evidence in the Litigation of High-Tech Patents, North Carolina Law Review, Vol. 87, 2009 * Mazur v. eBay Inc., 2009 WL 1203937 (N.D. [read post]
1 May 2009, 8:57 am
Colleen V. [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 4:40 pm
See, e.g., Craig Allen Nard, The Law of Patents 34 (2008) (asserting PTO grants patents on 39% of applications); Brief of the Boston Patent Law Ass'n as Amicus Curiae in Support of Genentech, Inc., on the Merits at 5, Medimmune, Inc. v. [read post]
