Search for: "Combs v. Combs"
Results 81 - 100
of 932
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2022, 7:49 pm
” The worst one, he said, was when, in a trademark case, he asked counsel to imagine he had a comb in the shape of a grape. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 7:37 am
Breyer is meticulous, combing through the district court record, elevating empirical data, canvassing science, and interrogating the legal standards applied by the lower court. [read post]
12 Feb 2022, 10:19 pm
Comments on social media--or even court filings, such as in Coronavirus Reporter v. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 11:43 am
This is a lawsuit between a wedding gown company, JLM, and Hayley Paige Gutman, a designer/influencer who worked for JLM. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 9:01 pm
You think you can prevent my candidate from joining the Court and reversing Roe v. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 12:21 am
Litecoin Foundation Limited v (1) Inshallah Limited (2) Nasjet Limited (3) John Pepin [2021] EWHC 1998 (Ch) (July 2021) Litecoin is a cryptocurrency, promoted and developed by the claimant. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 10:07 am
The Supreme Court found these conversations “presumptively privileged” in Nixon v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 4:30 am
In Garcia v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 3:30 am
From the NY Times:In a combative speech on Thursday, Justice Samuel A. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 9:00 pm
v=j-WLWBsIsL0Video Credit: Sean Evans, @evvo1991 backtothemovies.com/ [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 5:01 am
And agency officials, many of whom are Biden appointees, will comb through records and, in coordination with the White House, determine what should be released to the committee. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 8:04 am
The district court properly evaluated the relevant likelihood of confusion factors in light of the evidence presented at trial, including overwhelming evidence of the commercial strength of VAGISIL brand products and Combe’s Eveready consumer survey and a brand recognition, or “fame,” survey (Combe Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 8:04 am
The district court properly evaluated the relevant likelihood of confusion factors in light of the evidence presented at trial, including overwhelming evidence of the commercial strength of VAGISIL brand products and Combe’s Eveready consumer survey and a brand recognition, or “fame,” survey (Combe Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 11:56 am
” For the complaint:https://www.eff.org/document/eff-v-usps-complaint For more on this case:https://www.eff.org/cases/eff-v-usps-social-media-monitoring-icop For more on social media surveillance:https://www.eff.org/issues/social-media-surveilance Contact: HoustonDavidsonLegal Fellowhouston@eff.org AaronMackeySenior Staff Attorneyamackey@eff.org [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 5:48 am
Oklahoma: Righting the ShipLauren King PDF A Wealth of Sovereign Choices: Tax Implications of McGirt v. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:17 am
Under U.S. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 8:46 am
Briefly, in the matter of M.A. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 1:20 pm
” Performance Chemical Co. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 7:50 am
Two unanimous reversals from the Supreme Court highlight that today.The first is Garland v. [read post]
25 May 2021, 6:00 am
Combs v. [read post]
