Search for: "Combs v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 626
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2022, 8:43 am
United States”? [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 7:37 am
Breyer is meticulous, combing through the district court record, elevating empirical data, canvassing science, and interrogating the legal standards applied by the lower court. [read post]
12 Feb 2022, 10:19 pm
Comments on social media--or even court filings, such as in Coronavirus Reporter v. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 11:43 am
We’ve blogged about state laws directed at ownership of (and privacy regarding) employee social media [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 9:01 pm
You think you can prevent my candidate from joining the Court and reversing Roe v. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 12:21 am
The claimant said that by stating in their trade mark application their bona fide intention to use the mark, they caused the public to believe they were associated with the claimant. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 10:07 am
United States. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 4:30 am
In Garcia v. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 5:01 am
And agency officials, many of whom are Biden appointees, will comb through records and, in coordination with the White House, determine what should be released to the committee. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 8:04 am
The district court properly evaluated the relevant likelihood of confusion factors in light of the evidence presented at trial, including overwhelming evidence of the commercial strength of VAGISIL brand products and Combe’s Eveready consumer survey and a brand recognition, or “fame,” survey (Combe Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 8:04 am
The district court properly evaluated the relevant likelihood of confusion factors in light of the evidence presented at trial, including overwhelming evidence of the commercial strength of VAGISIL brand products and Combe’s Eveready consumer survey and a brand recognition, or “fame,” survey (Combe Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 11:56 am
” For the complaint:https://www.eff.org/document/eff-v-usps-complaint For more on this case:https://www.eff.org/cases/eff-v-usps-social-media-monitoring-icop For more on social media surveillance:https://www.eff.org/issues/social-media-surveilance Contact: HoustonDavidsonLegal Fellowhouston@eff.org AaronMackeySenior Staff Attorneyamackey@eff.org [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:17 am
Under U.S. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 8:46 am
Briefly, in the matter of M.A. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 1:20 pm
” Performance Chemical Co. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 7:50 am
Nelson, Bade, Collins, and Lee) (joined by two senior judges, O'Scannlain and Trott), and Justice Neil Gorsuch repeatedly mentioned in his opinion that the Ninth Circuit’s decision was rendered over the dissenting views of at least 12 members of that court.The second is United States v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 7:31 pm
Sergeant Ade also informed defendant in accordance with 2 Miranda v. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 12:41 pm
The Court also rejected Combs's argument that the Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 7:13 am
Citing Morales v New York StateDept. of Corr. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 7:05 am
Unfortunately, the agreement appears to be filed under seal, although given the docket’s volume, I can’t say I combed through it carefully. [read post]
