Search for: "Commonwealth v. Roman"
Results 21 - 40
of 54
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2018, 4:05 am
Mnyongani & Magda Slabbert, A Jehovah’s Witness’s Autonomy versus the Interests of Her Children – ES v AC Mnyonfd, (Journal of Contemporary Roman-Dutch Law, Vol. 81, p. 316-325, 2018).Joshua Moir & Julia Wagner, The Idea of Religious Neutrality and the Cooperation Model Compared in Germany, Austria and Italy, (University of Milano-Bicocca School of Law Research Paper No. 18-13 (2018).Constanza Nardocci, Equality & Non-discrimination between the… [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 8:49 am
App. 1997); Commonwealth v. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 3:01 pm
Danville Christian Academy, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 7:50 pm
This was interpreted as a sort of treaty between the Commonwealth countries in O’Donohue v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 6:43 am
The court distinguished the holding in Commonwealth Ins. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 3:48 pm
Recently in Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. [read post]
25 Dec 2016, 7:45 am
Haverty-Stacke, Trotskyists on Trial: Free Speech and Political Persecution Since the Age of FDR Sanford V. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 5:17 am
The Court answered that question affirmatively in the case of Roman v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court next term of Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 9:45 am
Roman Catholic Archdiocese of St. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 4:56 am
See Prince v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:33 am
…The content of the res publica in Rome was well articulated in the opening statement to the great compilation of Roman laws that form the Digest [of the Emperor Justinian I]: ‘Public law is that which has reference to the administration of the Roman commonwealth; private law is that which concerns the interests of individuals; for there are some things which are useful to the public, and others which are of benefit to private persons’” [publicum… [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 1:50 pm
See Randall v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 11:01 am
However, after the UK Supreme Court’s decision in Rubin v Eurofinance SA, that golden thread seems to have lost its lustre. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 9:03 pm
In two recent cases—Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 12:33 pm
This is kind of ridiculous even without the Roman numerals (though I could give you about XCIV reasons why you shouldn’t go above V with those). [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 12:07 pm
If you are interested in reading more about the case mentioned above, please see Luoni v. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 1:48 pm
Garrison Architects v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 8:51 am
SHAK v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 1:21 pm
Unlike the complaint, I do not use the term in quotes because the Supreme Court does not use the term in quotes, nor do the courts of Pennsylvania (Commonwealth v. [read post]
