Search for: "Cross v. Shell Oil*"
Results 1 - 20
of 66
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2023, 4:54 am
” Hagari also said more than 100,000 people have fled their homes in southern Lebanon amid the cross-border violence. [read post]
10 May 2023, 2:21 am
The defendants and respondents are both companies within the Shell group of companies. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 1:02 pm
The Rhode Island government brought identical complaints in Shell Oil Products Company LLC v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 9:05 pm
” This practice is far from unique to Shell. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 8:27 am
On March 2, 2022, the Supreme Court of British Columbia issued its decision granting an application for summary judgement dismissing a retail gasoline related class action (see Pantusa v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 11:11 am
During her two years there, her clients included Shell Oil, which Kruger represented in an appeal to the U.S. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm
”) Schwab v. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 3:42 am
On 12 February 2021, the UK Supreme Court handed down its judgment in Okpabi and others v Royal Dutch Shell and another [2021] UKSC 3 overturning the decision of the lower courts and granting the claimants’ appeal. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 5:36 am
Shell Oil Co., 2021 WL 1232694 (S.D. [read post]
26 May 2021, 4:09 pm
Ct. 1659 (2013), as well as Lubbe v. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 8:28 am
” Shell should be flying at first light. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:30 am
Royal Dutch Shell Plc (‘RDS’) is the parent company of the Shell group of companies, incorporated in the UK. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 11:31 am
Shell Oil Co., 519 U.S. 337, 340 (1997)). [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 6:25 pm
A little more than one year ago, we reported on a settlement (Cassell et al. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 11:30 pm
”[1] Did Judge Milazzo engage in judicial dodging with rejecting the relevancy argument and emphasizing the truism that Sanofi could highlight the discrepancy on cross-examination? [read post]
1 May 2019, 7:51 am
Supreme Court on the basis that US courts lacked jurisdiction in that case (case opinion here: Kiobel v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 8:38 am
,Inc. v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 9:05 pm
In its 2011 AEP v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
for claims against its subsidiary – sometimes with success, sometimes not: For example, in Okpabi & Ors v Royal Dutch Shell Plc & Anor, the English High Court, Queen’s Bench Division, by its Technology and Construction Court, decided that it had no international jurisdiction to hear claims in tort against the Nigerian subsidiary (SPDC) of Royal Dutch Shell (RDC) in connection with environmental and health damages due to oil pollution in the… [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 10:12 am
The parties briefs can be viewed by following the hotlinks on the Texas Supreme Court’s docket for Hill v Shamoun.483 S.W.3d 767 (2016)SHAMOUN & NORMAN, LLP, Appellant and Cross-Appelleev.Albert G. [read post]
