Search for: "DOW ELECTRIC, INC. v. USA" Results 1 - 16 of 16
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), applies to class certifications. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:16 pm by Bexis
Merrell–Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 523 A.2d 374, 376-79 (Pa. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., 2010 WL 2640170, at *2 (W.D. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
  Hoosier Energy Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from transferee:… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from transferee:… [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Joiner had been an electrician by a small city in Georgia, where he experienced dermal exposure, over several years, to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB’s), a chemical found in electrical transformer coolant. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
General Electric Co., 3 F.3d 329, 334 (9th Cir. 1993). [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from transferee:… [read post]