Search for: "Daniel E. Walters" Results 61 - 80 of 196
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2019, 10:30 am by Matthew Scott Johnson
Murphy’s article Enhancing the Role of Public Interest Organizations in Rulemaking Via Pre-Notice Transparency is cited in the following article: Daniel E. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 12:50 pm by Matthew Scott Johnson
Murphy’s article Arbitrariness Review Made Reasonable: Structural and Conceptual Reform of the “Hard Look” is cited in the following article: Daniel E. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 10:06 am by Schachtman
Gassert, Tony Fletcher, and Yv Bonnier Viger. 7 John Henderson Duffus, Ronald E. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 12:50 pm by Brandie Jefferson
The School of Engineering & Applied Science’s Daniel Giammar on mitigation “Thanks to this report, we can now weigh the cost of climate change versus the cost of mitigation,” said Daniel Giammar, the Walter E. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 5:06 am by Edith Roberts
In an op-ed for Roll Call, Walter Shapiro suggests that the Kavanaugh pick might not be as safe as it seems. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 4:06 am by Edith Roberts
At E&E News, Amanda Reilly reports that “[a]t issue are blocked culverts — tunnels that are supposed to allow streams to pass under roads — that the 9th Circuit decided violated tribal fishing rights in 1850s-era treaties between tribes and the Pacific Northwest’s white settlers. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
For example, “[w]e have extensive procedures and controls that are designed to identify and address conflicts of interest,” and “[o]ur clients’ interests always come first. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
Why Cabinet Secretaries Should Not Threaten Members of Congress August 14, 2017  | Cary Coglianese, Gabriel Scheffler, and Daniel E. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
Why Cabinet Secretaries Should Not Threaten Members of Congress August 14, 2017  | Cary Coglianese, Gabriel Scheffler, and Daniel E. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 11:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
A recurring issue in securities cases involves the question of when plaintiffs may rely on the presumption of reliance under the fraud on the market doctrine. [read post]