Search for: "Davis v. Target Corporation" Results 21 - 40 of 150
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm by Kevin LaCroix
   For example, in 2016, a Minnesota federal judge granted motions to dismiss filed by Target Corporation’s executives, directors and the board of director’s special litigation committee after the special litigation committee issued a 91-page report concluding that Target should not pursue derivative claims against officers and directors based on the company’s 2013 cyber breach incident,[7] which affected approximately 110 million… [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 1:29 pm
Pileggi, the Fox Rothschild attorney behind the Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation Blog. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 4:19 am by Broc Romanek
At issue in Davis was a decision by the compensation committee of Umpqua Holdings Corporation to pay increased compensation to certain executive officers for 2010 -- a year in which the bank's performance had improved and met predetermined compensation targets, but total shareholder return was allegedly negative. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 5:52 am
How Blockchain will Disrupt Corporate Organizations Posted by Mark Fenwick (Kyushu University), Wulf A. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 11:08 pm by Eugene Volokh
Bd. of Educ., 777 F.2d 1403, 1410 (10th Cir. 1985); Davis v. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 3:33 am by Broc Romanek
California Court Confirms Enforceability of Delaware Forum-Selection Bylaws As noted in this Wachtell Lipton memo, the California Court of Appeal recently became the second appellate court outside of Delaware – in Drulias v. 1st Century Bancshares – to recognize the enforceability of forum-selection bylaws adopted by Delaware corporations designating the Delaware Court of Chancery as the exclusive forum for the litigation of intracorporate & fiduciary disputes. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 6:08 am
Arlen and Marcel Kahan, NYU School of Law, on Wednesday, September 14, 2016 Tags: Accountability, Agency costs, Corporate crime, Corporate liability, Deferred prosecution agreements, DOJ, Liability standards, Management, Misconduct, Non-prosecution agreement, Securities enforcement, Settlements The Law and Brexit V Posted by Thomas J. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:54 pm by admin
Over the rest of the week I’ll be posting developments from 2013 and early 2014 in other key areas: civil and criminal competition law matters, competition law private actions, trade and professional associations and new Competition Bureau guidelines. ____________________ Court of Appeal Upholds “Prevent” Merger Decision In February 2013, the Federal Court of Appeal rejected the appeal of Tervita Corporation (formerly known as CCS Corporation) from the May 2012… [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 5:55 am
Kiviat, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, on Monday, April 22, 2019 Tags: Asset management, Bitcoin, Blockchain, CFTC, Commodities, Commodity Exchange Act, Cryptocurrency, Disclosure, Financial advisers, Financial technology, ICOs, Regulation D, Securities regulation Truth and Bias in M&A Target Fairness Valuations: Appraising the Appraisals Posted by Matthew Shaffer (University of Southern California),… [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 6:33 am by Tejinder Singh
Bennett (echoing the pre-CU decision in FEC v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 6:12 am
Rouhandeh, and Michael Kaplan, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, on Saturday, April 13, 2019 Tags: Bonds, Corporate fraud, DOJ, International governance, Misconduct, Rule 144, SEC, SEC enforcement, Securities litigation, Securities regulation, Volkswagen 2019 Proposed Amendments to DGCL Posted by John Mark Zeberkiewicz and Brigitte Fresco, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., on Saturday, April 13, 2019 … [read post]