Search for: "DeRosa v. District Court"
Results 1 - 15
of 15
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2018, 11:36 am
District Court for the Eastern District of New York dismissed an FDCPA Avila claim involving potential future fees and costs in Derosa v. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 2:14 pm
By Dennis Crouch DeRosa v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 1:20 pm
In DeRosa v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 5:00 am
DeRosa's "did not sever service with the district; rather, her service was only interrupted by service in a different tenure area.5. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 11:26 am
District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania, CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-2483, 2018 U.S. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 6:03 am
His written statements that prompted the district court to dismiss his case were "only in response to a question about his social activities. ... [read post]
22 Jul 2007, 11:21 pm
LEXIS 51104 (WD WI), a Wisconsin federal district court permitted an inmate to move forward with his claim that his rights under the First Amendment and RLUIPA were violated when prison officials prohibited him from using his religious name in filing grievances.In DeRosa v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 1:09 am
DeRosa-Grund U.S. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 10:05 am
The decision here along with DeRosa v. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 4:42 am
District Court for the Eastern District of New York 2012). [read post]
15 Sep 2018, 5:26 am
District Court for the District of Columbia issued a contempt order against Miller in August 2018 for his refusal to comply with the subpoena, which Miller is now appealing. [read post]
11 Jun 2022, 12:26 pm
EW v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm
Ed. 2d 97 (2015) (joined opinion) Tax Injunction Act “deprived the district court of jurisdiction to enjoin Colorado’s tax collection effort, we remand to the district court to dismiss DMA’s Commerce Clause claims” Energy & Env’t Legal Inst. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 7:00 am
San Antonio to the Southern District of New York. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
