Search for: "District of Columbia v. DOL"
Results 41 - 60
of 90
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2016, 7:01 pm
When the court challenge failed (NationsBank Corp v Herman, 4thCir, No 98-1127, April 6, 1999 (75 EPD ¶45,814); cert. denied, sub nom. [read post]
19 May 2016, 9:30 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia announced that West Virginia v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 6:04 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 6:46 pm
Disagreeing with the district court, the appeals court applied the Supreme Court’s decision in Long Island Care at Home, Ltd. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 11:47 am
Reversing a decision by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, an August 21, 2015 decision by the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Home Care Association of America v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 11:42 am
Reversing a decision by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, an August 21, 2015 decision by the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Home Care Association of America v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 11:42 am
Reversing a decision by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, an August 21, 2015 decision by the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Home Care Association of America v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit--has gone on to also address the other half of the RFRA equation: the D.C. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 2:09 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 6:55 pm
” The DOL notes that, as of February 13, 2015, 32 states and the District of Columbia (as well as 18 countries) extend the right to marry to both same- and opposite-sex partners. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 12:29 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia issued its second opinion, ruling against the DOL and vacating the portions of the new regulations that would have made more than 90 percent of home care workers eligible for overtime pay. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:44 am
Following its successful effort to vacate the third-party employer provisions of the Department of Labor’s domestic service regulation, the Home Care Association of America has now successfully challenged the DOL’s narrowed definition of “companionship services” in a ruling by the same judge in the federal district court in the District of Columbia. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 6:47 am
Sec. 552.109, scheduled to go into effect on January 1, 2015, was vacated in a ruling by a federal district court in the District of Columbia. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 11:44 am
After this seminar, on December 22, 2014, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia – in Home Care Association of America v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 6:02 pm
By Brian Steinbach On December 22, 2014, the District of Columbia federal district court vacated a new U.S. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 6:02 pm
On December 22, 2014, the District of Columbia federal district court vacated a new U.S. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 10:46 am
Determined to leave well-enough alone, a federal district court in the District of Columbia quashed the Department of Labor’s attempt to implement changes to the third party domestic service employer regulation that would have ended a 40-year old exemption from minimum wages and overtime pay. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 1:42 pm
A company’s outside counsel was acting as an attorney-agent when doing a background investigation and therefore did not qualify as a reporting agency under the FCRA, ruled a federal court in the District of Columbia (Mattiaccio v G, II v DHA Group, Inc). [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 10:24 am
Adopting the bulk of a magistrate’s recommendations, the federal district court for the District of Columbia has ruled that substantial evidence supported a DOL Administrative Review Board (ARB) decision — finding that Bank of America (BOA) consented to the desk audit portion of an OFCCP compliance review and that there was specific evidence of a violation of Executive Order (EO) 11246 to support the OFCCP’s decision to conduct an on-site review.… [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 10:24 am
Adopting the bulk of a magistrate’s recommendations, the federal district court for the District of Columbia has ruled that substantial evidence supported a DOL Administrative Review Board (ARB) decision — finding that Bank of America (BOA) consented to the desk audit portion of an OFCCP compliance review and that there was specific evidence of a violation of Executive Order (EO) 11246 to support the OFCCP’s decision to conduct an on-site review.… [read post]
