Search for: "Dodge v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 530
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2007, 3:29 pm
CAAF's daily journal for Wednesday, 4 April denied without prejudice the writ appeal in United States v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am by Schachtman
In my last post,[1] I praised Lee Mickus’s recent policy paper on amending Rule 702 for its persuasive force on the need for an amendment, as well as a source for helping lawyers anticipate common judicial dodges to a faithful application of the rule.[2] There are multiple dodges used by judicial dodgers, and it behooves litigants to recognize and anticipate them. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 5:13 am by Eugene Kontorovich
In today’s State Department briefing, spokesperson James Kirby dodged questions about whether the Administration would take further action to attempt to remove state sanctions. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 7:13 am by Herrman & Herrman, P.L.L.C.
On Tuesday, Takata agreed to double the number of vehicles recalled in The United States to 34 million due to defective airbags making it the largest recall in NHTSA’s history. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 6:15 am by Marty Lederman
Within days, every important state boxing commission in the nation had followed suit, effectively preventing Ali from fighting in the United States. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 3:22 pm by Gene Quinn
In March of 2006, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in eBay Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:24 am by Tejinder Singh
Today in the Community we are discussing United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by Amanda Shanor
” The Court notably took a similar approach last month in United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 2:46 am
    Until its bankruptcy in April 2007, New Century was one of the largest subprime lenders in the United States. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 5:01 am by Ingrid (Wuerth) Brunk
United States that the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) does not apply to criminal prosecutions. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 5:24 am by Harriet Pearson
A New Jersey federal judge yesterday issued the much-anticipated opinion in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]