Search for: "Doe v. Board of Medical Examiners"
Results 1 - 20
of 740
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2010, 3:31 am
”Commenting that the statute does not limit examinations to certain types of employees or duties, and has been applied to non-teaching personnel, citing Gardner v. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 3:52 am
"Commenting that the statute does not limit examinations to certain types of employees or duties, and has been applied to non-teaching personnel, citing Gardner v. [read post]
11 Sep 2016, 4:46 pm
The Supreme Court recognized as much in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 3:36 pm
Rizzo v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 3:30 am
The record demonstrates that the Medical Board considered all of the medical evidence submitted by Vargas, interviewed him, and performed its own physical examination of him. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 7:00 am
” The Commissioner said that a board of education has a statutory right to order an employee to submit to a medical examination pursuant to Education Law §913 “in order to determine the employee’s capacity to perform the duties of his or her position. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 4:00 am
Workers' Compensation Board’s granting an award for a work-related injury does not, "by operation of collateral estoppel,” automatically entitle the claimant to General Municipal Law §207-c benefitsJackson v Barber, 2015 NY Slip Op 08025, Appellate Division, Third Department Lawrence Jackson, diagnosed with plantar fasciitis* in his left foot while working as a correction officer for the Cortland County Sheriff's Department, filed an… [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 7:56 pm
North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 3:21 pm
In Riegel v. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am
The Board found that Dr. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 2:25 pm
The Board believed that the examiner had changed his opinion from his written report to his deposition testimony. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 10:39 am
Chudik v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
Citing Matter of Koratzanis v U.S. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
Citing Matter of Koratzanis v U.S. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 1:48 am
Canadian Federal Court considers whether Teva's COPAXONE second medical use patents were obvious-to-try (Teva v Pharmascience) (25 Jan 2021)Second medical use dosage regimen claim successfully traverses both insufficiency and "obvious-to-try" attacks (T 0799/16) (8 Mar 2021)When does pre-clinical data plausibly support a therapeutic effect? [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 10:00 am
The Appellate Division opined that the Board's denial of Officer's application for ADR benefits was not arbitrary and capricious noting that the relevant date for purposes of disability is at or prior to the applicant's retirement from service, citing Matter of Gullo v Kelly, 50 AD3d 449, leave to appeal denied 11 NY3d 702.The court noted that the Medical Board's consideration of evidence and reports after Officer's retirement, and… [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 10:00 am
The Appellate Division opined that the Board's denial of Officer's application for ADR benefits was not arbitrary and capricious noting that the relevant date for purposes of disability is at or prior to the applicant's retirement from service, citing Matter of Gullo v Kelly, 50 AD3d 449, leave to appeal denied 11 NY3d 702.The court noted that the Medical Board's consideration of evidence and reports after Officer's retirement, and… [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 8:50 am
" Pfizer, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 10:15 am
Next week, on October 14, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 1:37 pm
Supreme Court concluded in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
