Search for: "Does 1-237" Results 21 - 40 of 594
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2013, 11:54 am
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio granted summary judgment that: (1) OWW was collaterally estopped from challenging the invalidity of claims 1, 2, 4, 15, 16, and 20 of the ’237 patent; (2) claims 18, 19, 21, 22, and 23 of the ’237 patent were invalid for obviousness; and (3) Alps failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact with respect to inequitable conduct. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 9:39 am by Sean Hanover
So here is the basic rule of thumb: 1. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 2:45 pm
See also Vanston, 329 U.S. at 172, 67 S.Ct. 237 (explaining that the Bankruptcy Clause “does not mean wiping out the differences among the forty-eight States” and holding that state tort and contract law may determine the validity of creditors' claims). [read post]
12 Mar 2016, 1:13 pm by Sean Hanover
He was detained after violating his parole (drank the night before going to see his PO)* NTA was issued on 12/15/15, charging him under 237(a)(1)(B) only* On 2/24/16 he was ordered removed by Dempsey. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 6:45 am
” The firm is one of the biggest recipients of Republican campaign spending, earning more than $237 million in 2020, according to data compiled by OpenSecrets. [read post]
1 Oct 2016, 11:33 am by Sean Hanover
The code that deals with this is INA § 237(a)(2)(B)(i) (deportability). [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 11:52 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Residents who do not have computer access or who would like to schedule an appointment for children age five to 18 years old can call the COVID-19 testing information line at 908-237-7150, Monday through Friday, from 9 a.m. to 1 p.m.Patients are required to provide a copy of their prescription, either by bringing it with them to the testing site, or by sending a copy in advance. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 5:28 pm
Their primary purpose to allow a non-asset spouse to prosecute on or defend the divorce action, so that the parties are litigating on an equal footing so that one spouse does not have a greater economic leverage than the other spouse. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 11:29 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
AND "looks like a duck" comes up:Even though patent agents practice before theUSPTO in the same way patent lawyers do, a majority ofthe other courts that have considered this issue haveconcluded that an agent-client privilege does not exist.See, e.g., In re Rivastigmine Patent Litig., 237 F.R.D. 69,102 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) (“But it does not follow that becausethe agent is permitted to engage in this defined subuniverseof legal practice, his activities are… [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 12:25 am
Supp.2d 210, 237 (February 2, 2006 D.D.C. 2005); Bradford v. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 2:05 pm
Code § 1028(a)(1), and false attestation in an immigration matter in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]