Search for: "Does 1-88"
Results 21 - 40
of 2,095
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2009, 3:55 am
D1 discloses all the process features of claim 1. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 1:53 pm
Thompson, 88 S.W.3d 611 (Tenn. [read post]
24 May 2011, 6:00 am
HB 2174 was introduced May 11 and sped quickly through the House which approved it on May 13 on an 88-3 vote. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 12:29 am
For persons not covered by number 1., arrested for a third degree felony that does not involve any force or threat of force against a person.Bond: $2,5004. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 7:30 am
Rhoads, 268 Va. 81, 88-90 (2004). [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 4:01 pm
Most would have been better advised not speaking at all.The summary:1.) [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 10:52 am
On March 1, 2023, the U.S. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
From SSRN:Mohammad Abdullah , Analysing the Role of Shariah Supervisory Boards in Islamic Financial Institutions, (February 1, 2012).Joanie Sompayrac and Victoria Rose Burge, Does the Defense of Marriage Act Prevent the Internal Revenue Service from Treating All 'Married' Couples Equally? [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm
Quite to the contrary, it clearly follows from G 2/88 [2.5] that the technical features of a claim to an activity are the physical steps which define such activity. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 4:30 am
Lindley has posted Justiciability and Remedies in Administrative Law Challenges (The University of Chicago Law Review Online, vol. 88, April 1, 2021) on SSRN. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 4:00 am
PERB, said the court, "will defer to an arbitration award only in limited circumstances and it usually does not do so where the charging party alleges a violation of Civil Service Law §209-a(1)(a).As the Federation alleged the District had violated §209-a(1)(a) and (d), it was the precedent of PERB to refuse to defer to the arbitration award in this case. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 3:57 am
In particular, in the latter case, does an applicant have a legitimate interest in the grant of the (subsequent) European patent application in view of the fact that the filing date and not the priority date is the relevant date for calculating the term of the European patent under Article 63(1) EPC. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:22 pm
., 62 A.F.T.R.2d 88-5992, 88-1 USTC ¶ 13,766 (C.D. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 3:57 am
The Enlarged Board considered the EPC priority provisions of Art. 87(1), 88(2)-(3) and 89, Paris Convention Priority and the FICPI Memorandum in detail to come to its decision. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 2:20 pm
” See Board Op. at 1–2; J.A. 88, 218. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 3:46 am
That's an affirmance rate of about 88%, a five-point drop from last year's 93.93%. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 3:31 am
That's an affirmance rate of about 91.3%, a five-point rise from last year's 88%. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
In particular, the EPC does not define the points in time at which the pending status of an application begins and ends in all possible situations. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
In this respect reference is also made to decision G 1/03 [4], according to which the introduction during the prosecution of a European patent application of an allowable disclaimer does not change the identity of the invention within the meaning of A 87(1). [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 11:55 am
App. 5th 1, 88 Cal. [read post]
