Search for: "Does 1019" Results 81 - 100 of 235
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2011, 11:49 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
” Id. at 1341-42. link:http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/images/stories/opinions-orders/11-1019.pdf [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 1:55 pm by Viking
Silva, 380 F.3d 1018, 1019-20 (7th Cir. 2004); United States v.. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 9:00 pm
Maryland, 331 Md. 199, 627 A.2d 1019 (1993). [read post]
2 May 2022, 7:28 am by Mark Ashton
While quoting extensively from the petition, the Superior Court does a fair amount of grammatical editing. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 7:16 pm by Donald Thompson
The assumption underlying the constitutional right of confrontation is that a witness brought into the presence of the accused will be less likely to swear to a false accusation, or to do so convincingly (id. at 1019). [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 10:58 am by Schachtman
How does the new Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence (RMSE3d 2011) treat statistical significance? [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 2:12 am
A general incentive does not make obvious a particular result, nor does the existence of techniques by which those efforts can be carried out. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 2:21 pm
’s Trustee Act does not expressly impose a duty on trustees to diversify investments in accordance with modern portfolio theory (see The Trustee Act, 2009. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 6:56 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
” In re Wiseman, 596F.2d 1019, 1023 (C.C.P.A. 1979).Of motivation: However, as the district court explained, “[t]he standard to find a motivation to combine is far below what is sufficient to provesafety and efficacy to the FDA,” and therefore, “[t]he factthat the FDA found the comparison [between Vicoprofenand Zohydro ER] insufficient to satisfy its safety and efficacy standards does not speak to the issue of obviousness. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 3:15 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
” Inre Wiseman, 596 F.2d 1019, 1022 (CCPA 1979); see also Cross Med.Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 10:50 pm by Peter Tillers
Texas, 388 U.S. 14, 19, 87 S.Ct. 1920, 18 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1967), and to 'put before a jury evidence that might influence the determination of guilt,' Pennsylvania v. [read post]