Search for: "Duncan v. Kelly"
Results 1 - 20
of 30
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Some called for Congress to restore the FTC’s authority to seek monetary remedies for deceptive practices under 13(b), which the Supreme Court’s decision in AMG Capital Management, LLC v. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 4:42 am
Kelly Kasulis Cho reports for the Washington Post. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
When the New York City Department of Education [DOE] terminated an individual [Educator] serving in a civil service position in the Unclassified Service* during his probationary period, Educator file a petition pursuant to CPLR Article 78 seeking a court order annulling his dismissal from his position and directing DOE to reinstate him to his former position.Supreme Court dismissed Plaintiff's petition and the Appellate Division unanimously affirmed the lower court's ruling, explaining… [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
When the New York City Department of Education [DOE] terminated an individual [Educator] serving in a civil service position in the Unclassified Service* during his probationary period, Educator file a petition pursuant to CPLR Article 78 seeking a court order annulling his dismissal from his position and directing DOE to reinstate him to his former position.Supreme Court dismissed Plaintiff's petition and the Appellate Division unanimously affirmed the lower court's ruling, explaining… [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:54 am
Greenbaum, July 6, 2016, Kelly, J.). [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 4:08 pm
Statements in Open Court and Apologies On 4 June 2015, there was a statement in open court in the case of Kelly v Chief Constable of Merseyside Police before Nicol J. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
Judge Paul Joseph Kelly, Jr. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 4:04 pm
Duncan Larcombe is on trial over his dealings with then Colour Sergeant John Hardy, who was allegedly paid more than £23,700 for information about the royal family. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 12:20 pm
” The question arose in Leggat v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 4:00 am
As the Court of Appeals said in Duncan v Kelly, 9 N.Y.3d 102, a probationary employee may be discharged for "almost any reason, or for no reason at all" as long as the decision is not made "in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Clay v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division concurred with the Supreme Court’s ruling noting that “The giving of false statements in the course of an official investigation has been upheld as a ground for dismissal from municipal employment," citing Duncan v Kelly, 43 AD3d 297, affirmed 9 NY3d 1024.As the United States Supreme Court held in Bryson v. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 3:30 pm
Examples are US v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 12:30 pm
T. v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 5:43 am
The court said that the appointing authority was “entitled to discharge a probationary police officer ‘for almost any reason, or for no reason at all' as long as it is not in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason," citing Duncan v Kelly, 9 NY3d 1024. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 12:00 am
V. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 9:46 pm
See, e.g., USF&G, in which Justice HATHAWAY herself cast a vote in this manner, and Duncan v Michigan, 488 Mich 957 (2010) (DAVIS, J., concurring), in which the fourth justice in support of the former majority opinion in this case also cast his vote in this manner. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 8:31 am
Duncan, 744 F.2d 1490, 1499 n.17 (11th Cir. 1984). [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 12:29 pm
The Court also granted leave to appeal in one criminal case and released its latest orders in the matter of Duncan v. [read post]
