Search for: "Eastern S. S. Lines, Inc. v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 245
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm
As the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California aptly explained in United States of America v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 5:53 am by James McQuade
 The dangers of blurring the lines between professional conduct and holiday celebrations was demonstrated in a recent case out of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 1:47 pm by Lee E. Berlik
CSX and Norfolk Southern are railroad companies operating in the eastern United States and Canada. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
" Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Co., 194 NLRB 569, 470 (1971), et al. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 3:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
SCHIAVELLI; 08-CV-931 (NGG)(JO);  UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK; 2010 U.S. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 11:06 pm
Citing the parties' diversity of citizenship, FedEx removed the suit to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 6:43 am by Ronald Mann
  The circumstance was most apparent because the argument followed immediately upon United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 8:03 am
Syngenta Seeds, Inc., 443 F. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 4:59 am by Chris Wesner
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION AT COLUMBUS In re: NASHEL : : : : : Jose J. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 7:52 am
Core Wireless, on the other hand, is a non-United States corporation with one employee that exists solely to license its patent portfolio. [read post]
17 Jun 2005, 2:55 pm
Bottom line is that Talisman, which had lost in earlier rulings in this ATS case, sought relief based on the the Supreme Court decision in Sosa v. [read post]
The Court of Appeal affirmed the District Court’s adoption of the plurality view of the “Waters of the United States” in Rapanos v. [read post]