Search for: "Eisenberg v. Superior Court" Results 1 - 18 of 18
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2017, 9:24 am
This post examines a recent decision from the California Court of Appeal – 2d District: Dove v. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 4:28 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
The Riverside County Superior Court just granted a motion filed by Compassion & Choices on behalf of two terminally ill Californians seeking to intervene in the Ahn v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 3:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The Supreme Court's denial of the plaintiffs' motion was, therefore, proper. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 2:46 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The Supreme Court's denial of the plaintiffs' motion was, therefore, proper. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 10:41 pm by Greg May
” When a court begins its analysis with that sentence, as the court in Le v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am by Barry Sookman
The speakers with me on the session were Giovanni Dosi, Director, Institute of Economics, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna in Pisa and Mariana Mazzucato, Professor, University of Sussex. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
   From this general study, it is then possible to begin to focus more particularly on the interpretation and application of law, focusing on the role of the courts and their frameworks for statutory and constitutional interpretation. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 12:07 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently released a decision in Eisenberg v. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 5:01 am by Jonathan Shaub
  The various issues raised by the commission’s subpoenas and other requests for information are complex, and largely unanswered by the courts. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
— Nicholas Eisenberger & David Gottesman, Harvard Business Publishing, December 7, 2009 There are plenty of reasons to be disappointed with the Copenhagen climate talks that start today: the meeting will not result in a binding agreement, the timeframe for such an agreement is potentially years away, and of course, neither the US nor China has committed to binding reductions. [read post]