Search for: "English v. People"
Results 201 - 220
of 3,258
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2023, 12:56 pm
As famously expressed by Knight Bruce V-C in Walter v Selfe (1851) 4 De G & Sm 315, 322, the question is whether the interference ought to be considered a material inconvenience “not merely according to elegant or dainty modes and habits of living, but according to plain and sober and simple notions among the English people”; see also Barr v Biffa Waste Services Ltd (2013) QB 455, para 36(ii). [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 11:19 am
A sample, from Washington v. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 12:38 pm
Dette vil være tilfelle ved dypdykk i de fleste tema. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:54 am
District of Columbia v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 8:04 am
Jackson Women’s Health Organization and New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
Bruen is quite simply a national nightmare.In United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 7:06 pm
Its Press Reease follows below in the original Spanish and in an English translation. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 5:11 am
—Danielle Steel 1Franatovich v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 7:22 pm
Other people are involved. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
And it may help judges prevent (or call into question) misrepresentations about David v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 4:47 am
News can travel fast and to many people at once. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 10:43 am
(V. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 9:23 am
English is a funny animal. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:21 pm
In Tracey v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 2:10 pm
Speaking in English to a room full of French-speaking folks is unquestionably futile. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:00 am
L.M. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 7:00 am
Nokia v Oppo [2023] EWHC 23 (Pat) In a new development in the global dispute between Nokia and Oppo that spans seven jurisdictions across Europe and Asia, Mr Justice Meade of the English Patents Court has found that smartphone manufacturer Oppo infringes valid and standard essential Nokia 4G/5G patent EP2981103 on an “allocation of preamble sequences”. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 5:49 am
Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Gonzalez v. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 11:35 pm
BCZ[10] and Enka v. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 6:49 am
Or, in this case that call might eb made somewhat more problematic by the construction of a quite definitive territory the participants in which are specifically identified: "The Working Group seeks the input of all stakeholders (including international organisations, national human rights institutions, civil society organisations, research centres, academia, lawyers, law firms, DFIs, businesses, industry associations, trade unions, human rights defenders, and indigenous peoples)… [read post]
