Search for: "Ex Parte Lilly"
Results 61 - 80
of 116
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2012, 9:02 am
Next year, the Supreme Court’s Daubert decision will turn 20. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 2:02 pm
Eli Lilly & Co., 119 F.3d 1559, 1566 (Fed. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 11:58 pm
Eli Lilly & Co., 598 F.3d 1336, 1351 (Fed. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 9:17 am
The lack of adequate consumer protection also leads to socially wasteful investments, ex post damages, shrinking share of consumer surplus, others. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 2009 WL 5216930, at *12 (E.D.N.Y. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 8:52 am
Armitage's, of Eli Lilly and Company, presentation entitled "A New 102: Reform, Not Recodification". [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 8:52 am
Armitage's, of Eli Lilly and Company, presentation entitled "A New 102: Reform, Not Recodification". [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 3:46 pm
It is sure to be a special year as we have heard of only one parade participant having a discriminatory letter.All persons receive a letter to be a part of the parade. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 5:40 am
The EEOC explains it all for you – from Robin Shea’s Employment and Labor Insider GINA prohibits financial incentives as inducement to provide genetic information as part of employee wellness program – from Employment Law Matters EEOC sues predominantly African American hospital - for discriminating against black employees – from Developments in Employment Law Lillie Leon, 80-Year-Old Kindergarten Teacher, Sues City Over Firing From Public School… [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:07 am
The following ex parte requests were filed: (1) 90/011,759 (electronically filed) - U.S. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:07 am
The following ex parte requests were filed: (1) 90/011,759 (electronically filed) - U.S. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm
Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioners' supplemental briefPetitioners' reply brief CVSG Information:Invited: March 21, 2011Filed: May 27, 2011 (Deny) Title: United States ex rel. [read post]
18 May 2011, 12:33 am
Highlights this week included: US: FTC alleges companies were asleep at the wheel when they failed to report settlement agreements on Ambien CR; Commission uses the opportunity to provide industry guidance – and a warning (FDA Law Blog) (GenericsWeb) Gemzar (Gemcitabine) – US: Certiorari denied in Eli Lilly v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 1:56 pm
”Apotex’s Second ClaimIn his earlier judgment in Lilly v 8PM, Arnold J had held that the ex turpi causa rule applied where the beneficiary of the cross-undertaking has to rely to a substantial extent upon his own illegality in order to establish the loss claimed. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 4:21 pm
: Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University v Roche Molecular Systems Inc (IPKat) US: That was unexpectedly… well… expected: BPAI affirms Examiner’s obviousness rejection in Ex Parte Akio Ochiai concerning a health food product containing curcumin, scymnol and isoflavones (BT-IP Notes) US: VirginiaTech VERSUS series – Drug evaluation DVDs available (FDA Law Blog) Products Diovan HCT (Valsartan, Hydrochlorothiazide) – Germany:… [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 10:08 am
Reexaminations: In 1998, an anonymous requester filed a request for ex parte reexamination of U.S. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 1:44 am
Eli Lilly, 09-0222-cv Supreme Court, New York County: Part 5Criminal Practice City Denied Summary Judgment on Claims by Bicyclist Rendered Paralyzed in Accident Somma v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 9:07 am
Cir. 2010), or as being indefinite under the test provided in Ex parte Miazaki 89 USPQ2d 1207 (BPAI 2008). [read post]
4 May 2010, 11:32 am
His cheap shots reflect some serious stupidity on his part. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 10:26 am
Eli Lilly & Co., No. 2008-1248, 2010 WL 1007369 (Fed. [read post]
