Search for: "FEDERAL ELECTRIC CORPORATION v. Best"
Results 1 - 20
of 176
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2008, 9:41 am
Federal District Magistrate Judge, William T. [read post]
9 Mar 2008, 3:26 am
Board of Regents v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 11:27 am
Eventually, all federal purchasing will incorporate the measurement of GHG emissions as a contract requirement. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 1:46 pm
" By way of background, in 2004, two groups of Plaintiffs, one consisting of eight States and New York City, and the other consisting of three land trusts (collectively Plaintiffs), separately sued the same six electric power corporations that own and operate fossil-fuel-fired power plants in twenty states (collectively Defendants), seeking abatement of Defendants' ongoing contributions to the public nuisance of global warming. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm
An example of this can be found in Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 4:24 am
American Electric Power Co. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 8:30 am
As was perhaps best explained by the U.S. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 4:59 am
See Connecticut v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 1:45 pm
Sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants; electric light the most efficient policeman.3I like to think Brandeis’s last phrase is self-referential. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:39 am
In the third of our trilogy this week, let's take a look at the Supreme Court's decision in American Electric Power Co. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 5:47 am
Indiana Electrical Workers Pension Trust Fund IBEW,Del. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 10:33 am
Rind Line Construction & Electric, Inc., 970 So.2d, 424,426 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); Royal Sunalliance v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 4:02 pm
After Mass v. [read post]
16 Feb 2013, 7:23 am
The Milward decision embraced a vacuous methodology sometimes called “weight of the evidence” (WOE) or “inference to the best explanation,” which had been previously rejected by other Circuits, as well as by the United States Supreme Court, in General Electric Co. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
Harris, or in the best interest of society. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 1:42 pm
Haeger v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:11 am
It’s at best a clarification of the mootness rule. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 10:44 am
Anthony v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 4:10 am
Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 2:03 pm
Indeed, it is not surprising that paying ransomware attackers has become as routine a cost of business as paying the electric bill – but what is surprising (and shocking) is that no one seems to care. [read post]
