Search for: "Fail v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 65,946
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2024, 6:55 am
In Tuskia v. [read post]
11 May 2024, 10:09 am
This money judgment, however, only states that a party must pay a particular sum. [read post]
10 May 2024, 5:37 pm
The California Supreme Court’s decision in Naranjo v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 12:33 pm
Judge Garcia wrote the opinion in United States v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:01 am
Circuit’s application of the Fitzgerald test in Blassingame v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 7:00 am
Facts – This case (Martin-Viana v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:39 am
The court found that plaintiffs failed to state a claim under NY and California consumer protection law. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
Indeed, even in circumstances where an arbitrator makes errors of law or fact, courts will not assume the role of overseers to conform the award to their sense of justice" (Matter of New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Assn. v State of New York, 94 NY2d 321, 326 [1999]). [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
Indeed, even in circumstances where an arbitrator makes errors of law or fact, courts will not assume the role of overseers to conform the award to their sense of justice" (Matter of New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Assn. v State of New York, 94 NY2d 321, 326 [1999]). [read post]
10 May 2024, 5:10 am
In Pliva, Inc. v Mensing (564 U.S. 604 [2011]), the Supreme Court found that these plaintiffs’ state-law claims against generic manufacturers were preempted by federal law under the Supremacy Clause to the extent that state-law failure-to-warn statutes required generic drugs to provide more stringent, safer warning labels. [read post]
10 May 2024, 4:34 am
” People v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 3:27 am
See State v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 2:30 am
On these facts the cross-reference to Kern was too general, and the anticipation attack failed (neither document alone contained a clear and unambiguous disclosure). [read post]
10 May 2024, 12:04 am
It had eight depots spread throughout the State. [read post]
9 May 2024, 2:41 pm
S. 555 (1983), and United States v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:30 am
Wade, Griswold v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:45 am
The case is Jamie Allen Harless v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:00 am
Matter of Rijos v New York City Tr. [read post]
