Search for: "Farrell v. District Court" Results 21 - 40 of 102
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
U.S. antitrust law focuses “overwhelmingly” on harm to consumers, Farrell noted. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 4:00 am by Joan Farrell, JD, Senior Legal Editor
The district court held that the EEOC could not sue for discrimination based on the employee’s transgender status, but allowed the claim of sex discrimination based on sex stereotyping. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 4:00 am by Joan Farrell, JD, Senior Legal Editor
The district court held that the EEOC could not sue for discrimination based on the employee’s transgender status, but allowed the claim of sex discrimination based on sex stereotyping. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, is scheduled to hear a motion for preliminary approval of the record data breach settlement in the Anthem class action case. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
" As such, the court found that the redactions were appropriate.In a more recent decision on issues pertaining to assertions of privilege in response to discovery requests, the Superior Court emphasized that such issues were immediately appealable on an interlocutory basis as collateral orders.In Farrell v. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 1:12 pm
District Court Judge who sits in the United StatesDistrict Court for the Western District of Washington:  U.S. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 10:24 am by Jason Rantanen
In the case, the District Court determined a “reasonable royalty” using the well-known framework established in Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Appeals of district court decisions under this Rule are considered under the abuse-of-discretion standard. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:12 pm by Kraft Palmer Davies, PLLC
Hedges (Hedges) was a resident of the Southern Division of the Western District [2]  of Washington. 2. [read post]
27 May 2015, 1:09 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Not affiliated with school district; nonprofit. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am by Illinois BLJ
”[25]  A similar class action was recently dismissed from a San Francisco federal court in a case called O’Connor v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:36 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
”).The district court therefore did not err in concluding that theasserted claims would have been obvious in view of theprior art. (...)However, lack of certainty does not preclude a conclusionof obviousness. [read post]