Search for: "Ford Motor Co. v. EEOC" Results 41 - 59 of 59
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2014, 9:06 pm by Jason Shinn
What this means for Employers Employers and HR professionals should read the entire EEOC v Ford Motor Co. opinion. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 8:21 am by Jason Shinn
What this means for Employers Employers and HR professionals should read the entire EEOC v Ford Motor Co. opinion. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:17 am by Joy Waltemath
Thus, it reversed summary judgment in Ford’s favor on the EEOC’s failure-to-accommodate and retaliation claims (EEOC v Ford Motor Co, April 22, 2014, Moore, K). [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 8:21 am by Jamie LaPlante
Ford Motor Company and revived the EEOC’s lawsuit on behalf of a fired Ford worker with irritable bowel syndrome. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 3:56 am by Lorene Park
Likewise, five African-American employees were allowed to proceed on their retaliation and hostile environment claims based, in part, on an allegation that, after a coworker filed an EEOC charge on behalf of herself and a “class of Black employees,” they were given excessive workloads as compared to non-African-American workers (Rogers v Ford Motor Co). [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 7:28 am by Joy Waltemath
Despite having not filed their own EEOC charges, four African-American Ford employees could advance Title VII claims asserting that they suffered race bias and were retaliated against after their coworker filed an EEOC charge on behalf of herself and “a class of Black employees,” a federal district court in Illinois ruled, denying Ford’s motion to dismiss (Rogers v Ford Motor Co, July 26, 2013, Gottschall, J). [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:48 am by Jon Hyman
Ford Motor Co. (6/4/13) [pdf] illustrates the important role a determination of “similarly situated” plays in discrimination cases. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 7:04 am
When Carolyn Upshaw started filing EEOC charges against her employer, Ford Motor Company, it began to document her on-going performance problems. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 8:36 pm
Ford Motor Co., 113 P.3d 82, 94-95 (Cal. 2005) (Campbell precludes something called "aggregate disgorgement," which the court analogized to punitive damages); Engle v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Ford Motor Co., No. 08-1082 (6th Cir. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 10:05 am
Ford Motor Co., 113 P.3d 82, 94-95 (Cal. 2005) (applying Campbell to reject "aggregate disgorgement"); Engle v. [read post]