Search for: "Foster v. Cohen" Results 41 - 60 of 90
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2017, 12:07 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Solely to expedite her appeal of that issue, Michelle E.C. consented to a second permanency hearing order denying her motion to dismiss the proceeding and continuing Jamie J.'s placement in foster care. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 12:07 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Solely to expedite her appeal of that issue, Michelle E.C. consented to a second permanency hearing order denying her motion to dismiss the proceeding and continuing Jamie J.'s placement in foster care. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 12:20 pm by Kate Fort
Opinion here: Gila River Indian Community v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 10:45 am by Russell Spivak
  Factual and Procedural Background As stated above, the court addressed two actions simultaneously: Cohen v. [read post]
4 Mar 2017, 4:34 pm by Chuck Cosson
 Privacy serves to protect personal autonomy, and as an end in and of itself that fosters self-development.[4] As Daniel Solove noted, one of the key purposes of privacy is to allow individuals to exercise a degree of control over what we share, to develop “places of solitude…where we are free of the gaze of others,” and to manage boundaries that are essential for identity, self-esteem, and a personal sense that one is worthy of respect.[5] Publication of private… [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 2:05 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
., Mary Ann Glendon—an interesting debate on the right over what IP is and whether it’s a right; Julie Cohen: rights talk in privacy v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 6:08 pm by Eugene Volokh
” That phrase, like “Fuck the Draft,” would be constitutionally protected speech (at least when not said face-to-face to someone who is likely to be insulted, see Cohen v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:34 pm by Stephen Bilkis
It was designed to foster the open dialogue between lawyer and client that is deemed essential to effective representation. [read post]
25 May 2015, 11:54 am by Stephen Bilkis
Quintana, 237 A.D.2d 130, 654 N.Y.S.2d 27; Merola v Merola, supra; Kilmer v Kilmer, supra; Leffingwell v Leffingwell, supra ). [read post]
25 May 2015, 11:54 am
Quintana, 237 A.D.2d 130, 654 N.Y.S.2d 27; Merola v Merola, supra; Kilmer v Kilmer, supra; Leffingwell v Leffingwell, supra ). [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 4:04 pm
” And speech is protected even when it contains vulgarities, as the famous “Fuck the Draft” jacket case, Cohen v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am by Schachtman
  With fear and trembling, and sometimes sickness not quite unto death, federal and state judges, and lawyers on both sides of the “v,” must now do more than attack, defend, and evaluate expert witnesses on simplistic surrogates for the truth, such as personal bias or qualifications. [read post]
11 May 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Pebble Beach http://t.co/erLolM4EXK -> Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2014-05-06: Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2014-05-05: IP Allianc… http://t.co/G5cZiScEbr -> Use of domain name on website trade mark use -> Use of trademark in domain name on website trade mark use Cohen v Sunwing Vacations Inc, 2014 TMOB 65 http://t.co/UFn8xURDHk -> Two copyright exceptions missing: did the Scrutiny Committee know? [read post]