Search for: "Garcia v. Superior Court"
Results 41 - 60
of 129
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2018, 8:50 am
On October 22, 2018, the California Court of Appeal addressed that issue in Garcia v. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 11:00 am
Garcia, 486 S.W.3d 618, 629 (Tex. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:43 pm
Garcia Uhrig, 53, of Oakland, has been appointed to a judgeship in the Los Angeles County Superior Court. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 9:24 am
Superior Court of California, Tulare County, et al. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 9:24 am
Superior Court of California, Tulare County, et al. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 9:23 am
Superior Court of California, Tulare County, et al. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 7:48 am
Nordstrom California Supreme Court: Retail Privacy Statute Doesn’t Apply to Download Transactions – Apple v Superior Court (Krescent) CA Court Confirms that Pineda v Williams-Sonoma (the Zip-Code-as-PII Case) Applies Retrospectively — Dardarian v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 1:33 pm
Texas Supreme Court justices will entertain oral argument on the issue when they convene out of town -- in Houston -- tomorrow.The case is styled Hiawatha Henry, et al. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 11:56 am
., Garcia v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 3:00 am
Garcia v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 12:05 pm
That's the headline in today's MetNews about People v. [read post]
Hearing officer considers failed efforts at “progressive discipline” in setting disciplinary penalty
25 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
According, due to Bryant’s poor disciplinary history and his continued unwillingness to follow agency rules or behave in a professional manner, Judge Garcia recommended Bryant’s termination from his position as the appropriate penalty for his misconduct.* In Bigelow v Village of Gouverneur, 63 NY2d 470, the Court of Appeals said that such records could be used to determine the penalty to be imposed if [1] the individual is advised that his or her prior… [read post]
6 May 2016, 10:42 am
Regarding the contract formation, the court starts off strongly by citing the Nguyen v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 7:00 am
Nordstrom California Supreme Court: Retail Privacy Statute Doesn’t Apply to Download Transactions – Apple v Superior Court (Krescent) CA Court Confirms that Pineda v Williams-Sonoma (the Zip-Code-as-PII Case) Applies Retrospectively — Dardarian v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 9:00 am
LP (10/26/15) --- Cal.App.4th --- (discussed here); Garcia v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 8:00 am
In Garcia v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 7:18 am
Judson told Garcia to make sure [Thomas’] computer remained guarded while he obtained a warrant.People v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:43 pm
Appellate Court to Reenact Oral Argument in Westminster School District v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
In the latter category we place Newman v. [read post]
